Modesty, does it still apply ???

Two Piece Bikini

I recently saw an article about a youth camp pastor apologizing to his glorified neo-fertility-goddesses (embodied in young fertile women) for not having let them wear bikinis to church camp in the past.  As the article explains, he came to this shameful epiphany about his “toxic masculinity” recently while accompanying his fiancée and her 10-year-old daughter on a shopping trip, where they “desperately looked for a cute one-piece that would be appropriate for camp.”  LOL  So already it seems this Beta-chump pastor’s life is being spent auditioning to become the nursemaid and personal-shopping-assistant to an immodest single mother and her spawn from another dude.  They must make the preteen goddess look “cute”.(sexy)  And while taking his goddesses out shopping he came to realize, not only how unworthy he is of sloppy-seconds, but of his need to repent of all his former vestiges of patriarchal control over women’s sexuality.  It would seem that the patriarchal church fathers of the past didn’t adequately realize how women’s unrestrained sexuality is in fact the highest most divine thing a man can worship, those ancient saints believed women should be ruled over well.  Why they must have thought God to be more worthy to be obeyed than women!  Oh the misogyny!  /S

The article says: A Christian pastor has apologized for banning girls at his youth summer camps from wearing bikinis, admitting that it was wrong to lay ‘the weight of purity’ on the girls but not hold boys responsibly for being ‘gross.’

LOL  It sounds like a full-blown apology for our God-given male sex drive!  For the record: My sex drive was described in a cunt-court ordered evaluation as both “normative” and “robust”, and I will be making no apologies for my masculine sex drive, or my manhood, and I may even brag about it.  I’m truly sorry for all the Feminist’s unresolved penis-envy, but it just ain’t my fault that God made me a man, His preeminent earthly creature.  If rebellious Feminist women cannot resolve their envy of all men’s penises, and so seek to denigrate that which they all lack, it is no wonder that well hung studs like you and I should become lighting rods of their envious spite.  LOL

The pastorbater says: I am sorry that we have deemed a young woman’s body as something that “needs to be covered” …

Yeah!  Bend over in your thong, little camper, and show pastor your underaged babymaker!  Whores have more fun!  “Wear a swimsuit that lets you have fun.”  /S

The self-cucking pastor continues by saying: I am sorry if you felt sexualized by us telling you to cover up. I am sorry I didn’t teach boys to be men, and laid that responsibility on young women.

LOL This churchian clown lives in a backwards clown-world where girls are sexualized by covering up.  In light of that, I shan’t be posting any pornographic burqa pics!  LOL  And when females irresponsibly strip down to near nakedness, it is always going to be some male’s fault for noticing.   SMH   If you point out the wicked stench of their public immodesty, the people pushing lawlessness will reflexively blame you for noticing.  At my wife’s church, when I called out the churchian women for being immodest they said I must just be lustful, and when I called out a man for dressing immodestly they said I must be gay.  Their silly defense of their licentious false-teaching is no more advanced than, “he who smelt it dealt it.”

But pastor Supercuck wasn’t done yet: “Women are all shaped differently and for a male to come in and say what a female should wear? That’s the most ridiculous thing in my head now … The number one thing I hope comes from this is that we as leaders, especially in the church, would walk in humility and stop pretending we are the ones that have the answers.”

LOL He admits he doesn’t believe in exercising the good and holy patriarchal dominion over this earth that God created men to have, nor does this pastor feel he should give answers to women, but in humility he believes men should remain silent not usurping over women.(1 Timothy 2:12 fully inverted)  And he apparently lacks the good sense to even understand why people wear clothes in the first place.  I wouldn’t send kids to his camp.  You never know when his failure to understand modesty and why humans wear clothing will have him exposing himself as a result of his own lack of discretion.

I do have answers to many religious questions, as do many folks who comment here, so if you have a legitimate one, just ask it below.  And if you’re going to ask about a specific bit of clothing … if you have to ask … it’s immodest.

I also came across a podcast regarding churchian modesty and a recent twitter storm it sparked while I was preparing to write this post.  On the podcast the churchian thought-leaders lack much graveness, yet are still too polite to God’s enemies, and fail to go nearly as far as I would, nonetheless they do make a lot of good points.   Apparently they are starting to wake up to the fact that most all of churchianity is a great whoring after the defilers,(women) and giving womankind (the creature) the worth-ship to be listened to and obeyed above our Creator.

Logically, once you give up your right to enforce modesty, accepting the complete nudity and public display of every form of perversity by absolutely anyone is your only logical destination.

You gotta fight, for your right, to purity!

Seriously!  If you don’t want all your old and obese coworkers soon carrying on at work like it was an eight hour naked pervert pride parade, now is the time to speak out and start pushing back.  Sodom is the next scheduled stop on our cultural train track if we don’t do something about it.

34 thoughts on “Modesty, does it still apply ???

  1. Heres good wisdom about penis-envy!

    Heres further wisdom from thae source!!

    You know technicaly I’m on vacation,right!?
    This wisdom was orginaly meant for my co-confederates
    But I thought it would fit here for some reason!!

    Liked by 2 people

  2. So let’s put the facts together a little differently here. A male pastor, who is not married, comes to the “epiphany” that making pre-teen and teenage girls at his camp wear modest clothing is bad because it conveys the message that those same girls are causing the boys to lust. Under the guise of not making girls feel uncomfortable about their bodies, this single adult male is encouraging young women, who, from a biological standpoint, may be coming into their period of peak fertility, to wear a lot less clothing around him. If I were a bookmaker I’d put the odds of him being incarcerated for child molestation or statutory rape at 99.99%. LOL. What a doofus.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Sharkly,a unknown writer wrote this on 06/03/13 at 3:42pm
    New foreword:This pastor would he ever say this?:
    ”5,000 years ago we witnessed Eve being tempted by the serpents as she lusted after da lostas cocas.

    About 2800 years ago we witnessed Helen deserting her family and causing a war, whence tens of thousands perished.

    The important thing to see here is why the Neocons&churchians banned the GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN–because they teach of the TRUE NATURE of women.

    Women are only Virgins and nice and good when they are raised by STRICT, HEROIC MEN who reign over their fallen sexuality via their manly honor.”

    P.S.Would this pastor ever preach this?

    Liked by 3 people

  4. I’m glad to hear you found the HardMen podcasts because I just started listening to them a few weeks ago and wanted to tell you about their biblical patriarchy one from June.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. Stephanie,
    I wholeheartedly agree with your comment. You seem to be a rare woman with many righteous Biblical beliefs.

    However, while you have been away, I have made a change here at this site. Perhaps you weren’t aware of it. The women are to remain silent here in this online fellowship of Bible believers.

    Yes, there is the negligible consequence in that there are less comments and traffic on the site as a result of that decision. However there is eternal reward in endeavoring to follow in the ways of God’s righteousness. It has also made my ministerial task of correcting errors so much easier to accomplish in the time I spend keeping up the site. Women may still contact me privately through the contact page, however, even with that method, I would prefer women to strongly consider if what they are going to tell me or ask me is really necessary, and if I’m really the person God wants them coming to regarding their matters.

    1 Corinthians 14:34 If they want to understand something more, they should ask their own husbands when they get home. It’s shameful, you see, for a woman to speak in the assembly.
    The Wycliff translation says that it is a “foul thing” for a woman to speak in church.(the congregation of believers)

    Don’t forget that women can still contribute here through their male guardian/head. Furthermore if women beseech their husband, father, or other male guardian to share some thought here on their behalf, we are all going to enjoy the benefit of having the thoughts filtered through the responsible man who can correct for the dependent woman’s foibles. And perhaps he may even address your question or comment privately and thereby be given the opportunity and encouragement to exercise his priestly role over you.

    Men’s unified fellowship, when based in truth, is truly a gift that society will benefit from. I was brought to remember the following Psalm, and I may yet expound on it in its own post. It sort of contradicts this world’s generalized push to increase diversity as opposed to enjoying the close unity of a shared brotherhood.

    Psalm 133:1 Behold, how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity! 2 It is like the precious ointment upon the head, that ran down upon the beard, even Aaron’s beard: that went down to the skirts of his garments; 3 As the dew of Hermon, and as the dew that descended upon the mountains of Zion: for there the Lord commanded the blessing, even life for evermore.

    It only takes a few flies to spoil the precious ointment. The privilege to comment here is now exclusive to men only. However there is no need to apologize or respond.

    Perhaps I should ask all the men whether the women should still be allowed to use the “like” button to favor comments? It seems like that might still leave a small opening for women’s natural defiling influence. What say you men?

    Liked by 3 people

  6. Red Pill Apostle,
    While I didn’t make that accusation as part of my post, I had those same thoughts about him. Why is he making such a cringe-inducing public appeal to encourage kids to wear bikinis to his camp? I can’t imagine any possible good motive behind it.

    Liked by 3 people

  7. Simple solution to all of this. Have the pastor tell all females they will only be allowed at Summer Camp in the nude. Watch how quickly these idiots reverse course and cover up.

    Liked by 3 people

  8. I forgot to mention in the post that tempting people is the job of devils.  It’s that serious.  If you are allowing yourself to do the work of demons and tempt others just for the sake of being alluring, that is a pretty vain and uncaring manifestation of your selfish and evil heart.

    Somewhere there is a point where a person has made reasonable effort to not be a temptation to others,(I know you can’t preclude every possibility for others to think lustful thoughts) but I think our society revels in trying to dress and be alluring and sexy.(AKA sexually tempting) 
    I think the old order Mennonites and Amish have done a pretty good job of policing modesty among their membership.  I don’t think your clothing has to look like it is from 200 years ago, but what you wear in public should be modest like their clothing.

    I talked to a woman whose response to my mention of women’s immodesty was to say that “men are immodest too”. However, immodesty really does seem to be much more of a problem with women, and thus the bible warns women specifically about it.

    Fictional story: So I walked into a high end men’s clothing retailer, found an assistant and asked him where I could find the push-up underwear. He said, “I don’t know what you mean?” So I explained that it has a layer of 1/4″ foam that wraps around your dick to make it look fuller and makes it stick out very noticeably instead of keeping it tucked in like most men’s underwear. The assistant said they didn’t have anything like that and that he had never even heard of push-up underwear for men. So then I asked if he had any pants that would really show off my dick cleavage. Again the dude seemed confused, and asked me what dick cleavage was. I had to explain that it was just like women’s cleavage, and that the pants were designed to scoop down in the front and display the top third of your dick. Again he shook his head, kind of chuckled, and said he had never heard of such clothing. So then I said can I get a bathing suit that shows a peek of side-schlong, or maybe some cropped shorts that might tease the womenfolk by showing a bit of under-ball? Again he said he couldn’t help me with that. So I got disgusted, huffed that they didn’t have any sexy outfits and turned around and stomped out.

    Liked by 5 people

  9. I have an assignment for y’all. A massive portion of the problem is the “White Knights”, the men who reflexively stick up for the unrestrained behavior of naturally defiling women. We need to call them out and shame them for their moral cowardice. However, on the surface, a “White Knight” is something with a traditionally good connotation. We need a good term to zing them with that shames them for their cunt-worship. I’m fine with calling them “cunt-worshippers”, but many people don’t want to say that, or “pussy-beggars”. So I was hoping that we could come up with a catchy moniker for the “White Knights” that perhaps has both an embarrassing connotation and either a ring to it, or a bit of humor, or something that just really nails their problem.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. I have some wisdom from late april’18 that you might remember sharkly!

    ”Imagine if this pastor
    had put all his energy proclaiming that women were entirely responsible for
    Jesus
    into actually defending Jesus and purity
    in the Greater Culture.”

    Also why does this pastor did this act on tv last night?

    Is this what hell is like for eternity!!?

    What about wussy garment knights (of the magic girdle underwear{Thats the long complete version of their official title!}),sharkly as the new term for white knights a.k.a cunt worshippers a.k.a. pussy-beggars!?

    Like

  11. Sharkly – My first submissions for your assignment: Vagina vigilantes? Breast buddies? Dickless wonders? Manpons (my favorite so far)? Mr. maxipad? Mom jeans?

    If I think of any others I’ll be sure to submit them.

    Liked by 2 people

  12. One name I saw that I really liked was, “Gynogrovelers“. And since they reflexively and subconsciously defend all female-supremacy nonsense like a Feminazi would, I think it might be quite fitting to call them “Effeminazis“. LOL

    Liked by 3 people

  13. If I were a bookmaker I’d put the odds of him being incarcerated for child molestation or statutory rape at 99.99%. LOL. What a doofus.

    Since he’s marrying a slore (unless she’s a widow, which I HIGHLY doubt) with a 10-year-old daughter (you do NOT want to be a step-daddy to a pre-teen girl, trust me – especially if Mommy either never married Daddy, or kicked him to the curb.
    Such little girls ALWAYS have “Daddy issues” and are uncontrollable ), it is almost assured that even if he’s not facing criminal charges for molestation in about five years, he’ll be going through the frivorce meat grinder after slore decided that Pastor Schlub has outlived his usefulness.

    This guy needs a VW Beetle-sized Red Pill suppository.

    Liked by 4 people

  14. Simple solution to all of this. Have the pastor tell all females they will only be allowed at Summer Camp in the nude. Watch how quickly these idiots reverse course and cover up.

    Given the sheer perversion and idiocy of modern American churchianity, it wouldn’t shock me in the least if they were to be perfectly okay with the girls going nude, but remained upset by a bikini ban.

    If God were not a God of mercy, He would probably ignite a forest fire and burn that churchian camp to the ground.

    Liked by 3 people

  15. ‘Maxipad’ seems pretty powerful!

    >We need a good term to zing them with that shames them for their cunt-worship.

    How about just calling them simps? A simp being somebody who runs errands for a woman and gives her gifts all the time without ever making a move.

    A white knight’s behaviour might not resemble this but the motivation is the same and the shame of being compared to a simp might wake them up to their principled cowardice.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. Due to my masculine magnanimity I have been trusting people to act according to the few and sensible rules of this forum. However, “Granny Weed” returned to violate our new divinely inspired “no defilers” rule. Apparently she was triggered by talk of a return to modesty, patriarchy, and the female subjection that is expedient to bring any society to a state of righteous flourishing. But alas I, a member of the patriarchy, have finally arisen this morning from my peaceful slumber, and the intrusion of the silly woman’s tantrums have been scrubbed from this post and her public voice has now been silenced here.(unless she has a henpecked husband who is foolishly willing to submit her Feminist screeches) True patriarchy may not always act immediately, but it is by nature unapologetic for its standards and usually unrelenting in their application, like our Father & Son Godhead a longsuffering and patriarchal Godhead of Justice, yet with mercy. So, “Granny Weed” Is always welcome to privately repent of her uppity commenting by which she intends to usurp man’s God-given dominion over her. And perhaps she can then beg her husband to submit her petition for forgiveness here.

    Luke 2:14 Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. ‘Perhaps I should ask all the men whether the women should still be allowed to use the “like” button to favor comments? It seems like that might still leave a small opening for women’s natural defiling influence. What say you men?’

    As you’ve shown wisdom and courage in related decisions, I will be content with your decision, whatever it is, in this area also.

    Liked by 1 person

  18. I was wondering if any of you men had any thoughts on the recent unrest concerning female Olympic athletes objecting to their butt cheek baring, camel-toe showing outfits? Is this God’s spirit at work in their hearts, desiring modesty, or have Feminists and their sexual revolution somehow just turned to the left full circle?

    Like

  19. ‘If God were not a God of mercy, He would probably ignite a forest fire and burn that churchian camp to the ground.’

    He’s being patient while evil comes to its fulness. It ain’t the OT anymore. Much as I preferred the OT.

    Liked by 1 person

  20. I like the efficient one-word shots, so favor Effeminazi and Gynogroveller. Have used the latter myself a few times! Nobody has to think about what it means. Leaves a mark.

    As for the OT, what you’re seeing is the display of young female sexuality, overwhelmingly by agency of women, specifically their mothers. This is the come-get-it-oh-no-you-monster ‘nuclear option’ in female-imperative strategic terms. . . an intentional (but deniable) aggression of the feminine to increase control and power over the masculine. It is revived constantly by cultures across time because it works.

    The inflexible rule is: the more highly sexualized a society, the more firmly it is under control of the feminine — females at large plus their overshadowing spirits, in this case the tsah-rah and allied demons.

    The less-sexualized the society — the more female sexual power is constrained — the more masculine/patriarchal and stable.

    The display of adolescent or teenage female sexuality is not a new tactic of collusion between the demonic and the feminine. It is ancient, and present in one form or another in every human age. Over the past two or three decades I’ve written at length concerning the role of Kore, Persephone etc. in the modern Eleusinian Mystery that is Western Culture.

    In the OP the pastor, girl, and mother are just as much active participants in the current version of these pagan rites as were worshippers on ancient Danite and Canaanite hilltops — rites which the prophets tried (unsuccessfully) to purge from their society, surrounded as they always were by people reveling in those sex-fertility cults. Especially the elites of society.

    There are many Biblical citations applicable, but I’d direct you first to Matthew 14. How did the magnificent John the Baptist come to be so cowardly murdered? Well, a member of the State (secular power) became excited by a mother’s display of her young daughter’s sexuality, and murdered a high-ranking member of the Church in order to please the mother and daughter (female imperative).

    What was/is the woman’s motive? To increase the power of females relative to males. To bring men and boys under subjugation of the feminine, and under subjugation to the fallen angelic authorities that manipulate women via the female thirst for usurpation and power.

    Liked by 3 people

  21. Wow, Ray!
    I wish I could doubly “like” your last explanatory comment.
    In response to your comment prior to that one, I’m reminded that even though I love God’s word and love the wisdom and righteousness of God’s enduring laws found in the Old Testament, the new covenant revealed in the New Testament is better for us humans.

    Hebrews 8:6 But now hath He obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also He is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises. 7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.

    For those who are unaware, the image currently on the masthead above every page here, is of “The Rape of Proserpina” by Italian artist Gian Lorenzo Bernini, sculpted between AD1621 and 1622 when he was only 23 yeas old. The word “Rape” is the traditional translation of the Latin ‘raptus’, “seized” or “carried off”, and does not refer specifically to sexual violence. Proserpina is alternately known as Persephone, Kore, or Isis. And in the sculptural masterpiece she is shown being abducted to become the wife of Hades/Pluto, lord of the underworld. So in the myth the goddess of birth and fertility was taken and ruled over by the god of death.

    However in our Christian faith, as Ray has explained, women (who were created to help a man, to reproduce with him, to obey him, to reverence him, and to keep him from being alone) have instead been led by evil forces to thirst to usurp her superior and to defile her “lord” by her cunning manipulation.

    The earliest church father’s all knew this:
    Tertullian said (in ‘De cultu feminarum’ ‘The Apparel of Women’, Book I, Chapt. 1):
    And do you not know that you are (each) an Eve? The sentence of God on this sex of yours lives in this age: the guilt must of necessity live too. You are the devil’s gateway: you are the unsealer of that (forbidden) tree: you are the first deserter of the divine law: you are she who persuaded him whom the devil was not valiant enough to attack. You destroyed so easily God’s image, Adam/man. Because of the death you merited, even the Son of God had to die.

    Woman is the root of all evil. ~ Saint Jerome AD 347 – 420

    …it is still Eve the temptress that we must beware of in any woman. ~ Saint Augustine AD 354 – 430

    I’m still reading, but Tertullian says that a daughter of Eve should wear the garb of penitence if she desires to live again.

    They have turned the very excellence of women, their natural beauty, into a cause of evil, in order that their good fortune might profit them nothing. … vainly adorning or uncovering themselves so that they might become offensive to God.

    We must regulate our desires according to God’s distribution to us, otherwise we [men] become the prey of [women’s] ambition [to seduce us] and all Its attendant evils.

    Oh if only preachers could tell the truth like that today!

    Liked by 3 people

  22. No question about the superiority of the NT over the OT. The difference is as big as comparing Christ to Baptist John.

    However, my nature and proclivities are well-known to the King. He’s the one who called me out. If He’d wanted somebody else, somebody more like Him, then He’d have sent somebody else.

    Liked by 3 people

  23. I hear you, Ray. Some people have said that I spend too much time in the Old Testament. By that, I think they mean that they wish I hadn’t read the Old Testament, and wasn’t able to use it to correct their twisting of the New Testament.

    If the Lord of all spirits and all flesh had wanted some smooth talking dude to kiss butts and compliment babies, He sure couldn’t have picked a person less suited to it than I. In the case of Jonah, the prophet sent to Nineveh, I doubt he gilded his message, since he was hoping for them all to be destroyed. But oddly enough his harsh message resulted in the city wholeheartedly repenting. Whereas today we have a church on every corner with a gynogroveling pastorbater fellating the attendees with his tongue, and yet, on their watch, our society has grown as wicked as can be and is still growing worse. It almost seems like sucking ass isn’t the way by which God’s Spirit works. As if we need to humble ourselves before God, and not the other way around. But surely half a million Effeminazi preachers can’t all be wrong can they? How could they ask any “daughter of the King” to descend from her pedestal? Why their churchian whores are even too good for death. LOL And yet scream and flail as they might, Hades will eventually rapture them all.(except for the elect, being separated out from among them to become the bride of Christ)

    Liked by 3 people

  24. female Olympic athletes objecting to their butt cheek baring, camel-toe showing outfits

    I’d have to surmise that their objections are largely a matter of these slore costumes having been imposed upon them by a male-dominated decisionmaking body, rather than it being a collective decision of the women themselves to “let it all hang out.”

    Really, the IOC should have used reverse psychology. If they wanted the female athletes to dress like slores and be happy about it, they should have ordered them to dress as their late Nineteenth Century athletic forebears did. That would have immediately prompted a “strip-a-thon” that would have made the current outfits over which they’re outraged look 19th Century by comparison.

    Liked by 2 people

  25. “And do you not know that you are (each) an Eve? The sentence of God on this sex of yours lives in this age: the guilt must of necessity live too. You are the devil’s gateway: you are the unsealer of that (forbidden) tree: you are the first deserter of the divine law: you are she who persuaded him whom the devil was not valiant enough to attack. You destroyed so easily God’s image, Adam/man. Because of the death you merited, even the Son of God had to die.”

    Oh if only preachers could tell the truth like that today!

    Unless or until they do, there is no point in attending their churches. Such bodies are gatherings of Satan’s servants, devoid of faith-based works and openly contemptuous of God’s word. Jesus never openly said it, but He didn’t need to because everyone was familiar with Genesis 3: you cannot serve both God and estrogen.

    Liked by 2 people

  26. I have a few times seen their near bare butt outfits in some recent pictures, I would say that had Avery Brundage, the only American to hold the IOC Presidency, seen these outfits, he would ban them. He would not wait to suspend or send home athletes wearing these outfits. He would also have sent home the Tongan oiled flag bearer and warn the Tongan delegation not to pull that stunt. I think he had a preference for decorum and would have very little tolerance for monkey business.

    Like

  27. Deep Strength put a timely post up today:
    https://deepstrength.wordpress.com/2021/07/26/jason-meyer-john-pipers-successor-resigns/
    The churchians have let Marxist woke Critical Race Theory into their churches, since they don’t have the discipline to keep any false doctrine out, only true doctrines, and now it is biting them in the Butt. LOL

    German/English word of the day Schadenfreude:
    Schadenfreude is the experience of pleasure, joy, or self-satisfaction that comes from learning of or witnessing the troubles, failures, or humiliation of another.

    Liked by 1 person

  28. THIS is needed here too sharkly,but the comment length is a little long!!

    ”churchians oft say& write, “Since THE GREATBOOKSFORMEN loves to talk about the law of Moses, lets discuss it briefly.”

    This is a remarkable and telling comment from a Churchian, who thinks that Moses is irrelevant to Christianity.

    I pointed this out by showing how Jesus also loved to “talk about the law of Moses,” and was threatened with being banned and censored.

    Our Lord Jesus Christ Honored The Law of Moses, which churchians detesteth and scoffs at, considering only worthy of “brief discussion,” and only because GBFM brought it up. Well, long before da GBFM, our Lord Jesus Christ also brought it up–in these translations Jesus cites THE LAW OF MOSES directly:
    Matthew 5:17 (CEV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
    THE LAW OF MOSES
    17 Don’t suppose that I came to do away with the Law and the Prophets. I did not come to do away with them, but to give them their full meaning.
    Matthew 5:17 (ERV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
    Jesus and the Old Testament Writings
    17 “Don’t think that I have come to destroy THE LAW OF MOSES or the teaching of the prophets. I have come not to destroy their teachings but to give full meaning to them.
    Matthew 5:17 (GW) | In Context | Whole Chapter
    Jesus Fulfills the Old Testament Scriptures
    17 “Don’t ever think that I came to set aside MOSES’ Teachings or the Prophets. I didn’t come to set them aside but to make them come true.
    Matthew 5:17 (GNT) | In Context | Whole Chapter
    Teaching about the Law
    17 “Do not think that I have come to do away with THE LAW OF MOSES and the teachings of the prophets. I have not come to do away with them, but to make their teachings come true.
    Matthew 5:17 (TLB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
    17 “Don’t misunderstand why I have come—it isn’t to cancel THE LAWS OF MOSES and the warnings of the prophets. No, I came to fulfill them and to make them all come true.
    Matthew 5:17 (NOG) | In Context | Whole Chapter
    Jesus Fulfills the Old Testament Scriptures
    17 “Don’t ever think that I came to set aside MOSES’ Teachings or the Prophets. I didn’t come to set them aside but to make them come true.
    Matthew 5:17 (NCV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
    The Importance of the Law
    17 “Don’t think that I have come to destroy THE LAW OF MOSES or the teaching of the prophets. I have not come to destroy them but to bring about what they said.
    Matthew 5:17 (NLV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
    Jesus Teaches about the Law
    17 “Do not think that I have come to do away with THE LAW OF MOSES or the writings of the early preachers. I have not come to do away with them but to complete them.
    Matthew 5:17 (NLT) | In Context | Whole Chapter
    Teaching about the Law
    17 “Don’t misunderstand why I have come. I did not come to abolish THE LAW OF MOSES or the writings of the prophets. No, I came to accomplish their purpose.”

    Dear churchians
    Go ahead and delete this. I am copying it and taking a screenshot of it, so that the world can know that you are A) bearing false witness against Jesus and Christianity and B) Censoring and deleting Jesus’s own words so that you can replace true Christinaity with your gamey version which denies the LAW OF MOSES which JESUS CAME TO FULFILL.”

    Everybody see better how the law of MOSES works with JESUS!?
    Thats how we use to do it before almost everybody became churchian!!!

    Liked by 2 people

  29. “I hear you, Ray. Some people have said that I spend too much time in the Old Testament. By that, I think they mean that they wish I hadn’t read the Old Testament, and wasn’t able to use it to correct their twisting of the New Testament.”

    Love this Sharkly … One of the concepts that opened the Gospel further to me was being taught that all of the OT points to the cross. I was told this in a college ministry (RUF) I attended. Since reading, contemplating and deciding that red pill philosophy does accurately describe the relationship between men and women, the OT has jumped off the pages at me. OT law about the roles men and women have make sense as applicable today, not as some historical rule in God’s word that is there to be used as a history lesson. The concept Paul lays out of headship in marriage existing to model of Christ and the church comes alive. Then there are all the instances where the OT points specifically to God’s plan to redeem His people. Genesis 15 for example where he is making the covenant with Abraham and instead of making Abraham take the penalty for breaking the covenant, He puts Abraham to sleep and performs both parts of the covenant Himself. This taking of responsibility for another’s actions is headship. God models it with Abraham. Christ completes it for his bride. This is what God intended to be modeled in marriage and why women are to be under the rule of those men who would bear the cost of their poor actions. Scripture is full of amazing truth, patiently waiting for our minds and spirits to find it.

    Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s