Usurper

The Swan Princess by Mikhail Vrubel

Tsarevna Lebed, The Swan Princess by Mikhail Aleksandrovich Vrubel painted in 1900 AD.

I found a good comment by “thedeti” responding to Jack’s post over at Σ Frame.  So, I will post his comment in its entirety, as I have done once before.  I borrowed the illustration below from Pete Rambo.

slide1

Thedeti says:

The main problem though is everyone thinking women are using this model; but they’re really not. This is really really subtle.

Jack describes this model:

God
Man
Wife
Children

Children submit to wife/mother. Wife submits to Man. Man submits to God.

Most Christian women, and nearly all clergy and Protestant family ministries, use this model:

God
Husband & Wife
Children

Children submit to wife/mother. Wife submits to God. Husband submits to God. Husband and wife submit to each other. Wife submits to husband if and only if she gets clearance from God through “her Holy Spirit”. (Her feelings, really.) Wife filters everything Husband wants, needs, desires, is, and does through “her Holy Spirit”. (“Is this in line with God’s will?” Does my Holy Spirit lead me that this is OK?”) If “yes”, submission to her husband is approved. If “no”, she is not required to submit to her husband.

Under this model, Husband and Wife are co-equal partners. Neither is above or below the other.

The husband is also not called “man”. He’s “husband”. In her eyes, his sole function is to serve her interests as protector and provider, and as “priest, prophet and king”. It never occurs to her that he has other functions. It never occurs to her that God has higher, loftier things for him. To her, the husband is HER priest, HER prophet, and HER king — Those functions were created, and he occupies them, solely for her benefit. His sole functions are to make money and turn it all over to his wife; to take a bullet for her; and to pray for her and lead her. In this model, Husband has literally no other functions or purposes. The marriage, the relationship, become all about her, and what she wants, needs, desires, is, and does. In doing so, submission to God falls away; and he submits to his wife.

This is wrong, of course, but today’s Christians use it because it gives lip service to submission without actually requiring true submission. It lets her “top from the bottom”. It lets her run the show without actually looking like she’s running the show. And it lets women feel better about “submission” because it is the one thing every woman hates – to lay it all down in the marriage before a man – a man she picked. Most women don’t ever truly submit to a man.

In heaven, men and women aren’t given in marriage to each other. But down here, in the fallen world, she submits to him, and he submits to God. If she has questions about God’s will for her, her marriage, or her children, she’s to go to her husband and have HIM seek the Lord about it. If she has questions about what God’s word says, she’s to go to her husband and have HIM seek the Lord about it. If she isn’t getting what she wants/needs in her marriage, she’s to go to her husband and have HIM seek the Lord about it.

God calls him. He follows. Or not, in which case he does it himself until he is at his wit’s end.

He invites her. She follows. Or not, in which case she does it herself (or with a series of other men in psuedo-submission through sex), until she’s at her wit’s end. (Gee, I wonder where I’ve seen that before?)

Most marriages don’t run this way. They just don’t. They LOOK like they do, the participants SAY they do, but they don’t.

There are no longer whores, only verbally abusive men. /S

Scantily clad whores in skimpy clothes. Prostitutes going for a slut walk. Only three things don't get cold in the winter, Polar Bears, Penguins, and Whores

Slut-Walks are now being organized by sluts to reclaim the word “Slut”.  Apparently the word “Slut” has a bad connotation. Slut-walk organizers say that the shaming connotation was caused by “The Patriarchy”, which is to say: all previous generations of the church that upheld God’s patriarchal order and laws condemning sexual immorality and effectively instilled their godly values throughout past generations of society.   But, no more!   The word “slut” now will mean; an empowered woman who seduces and copulates with whichever men of her choosing will dare to stick their dick into her.  Only “slut” will now supposedly mean that in a far more positive way, free from the shaming that societies influenced by an effective patriarchal church, previously maintained.

So how did we get to be such an immodest and immoral generation where women openly attend church dressed like the whores that they have become?

The immodesty and immorality of our generation is the legacy of cowardice and inaction on the part of the previous generation of leaders of our nation’s churches.  Cowardly leadership has led to a worthless “church” that today intentionally resembles the world, which has grown much more evil on those hirelings’ watch.  These apostate churches no longer lead our culture towards modesty and morality, but instead they follow the world into immodesty and immorality.  Will the churches of our children’s generation be returned to modesty under our watch?  If not, we’re not fighting hard enough or effectively enough.  You can read the lack of willingness to enforce modesty in today’s typical churchian assemblies in the following language from Whitewater Community Churches website:

Come as you are

Casual, Business Dress, Formal.   At Whitewater Community Church our concern is not on your outward appearance, but on the inward appearance of your heart.

While that sounds so “nice”, what that is really saying is; that they haven’t the balls to rein in attention-seeking immodest sluts.  Modesty won’t be forced to return while impotent churches lazily preach “come as you are”.  Profligate whores have slut-walked their way into these churches and the churchians esteem them as their pure hearted goddesses.   The goofballs that mismanage such churches are probably far more upset by my use of derisive words designed to shame their immodest and immoral congregations.

While floozies want to boldly reclaim the word “slut”, most misguided churchians try to assist by shaming upright men, hoping to just keep us from ever calling anyone a slut.   As you can see, Satan’s Feminist minions will continue to denounce God-fearing men as being “mean-spirited” or “verbally abusive” even after they have already restricted them from using anything more forceful than mere words to discourage immodesty. The whores and apostate churchians combined satanic goal is to “smash the patriarchy” removing all of men’s ability to correct wayward women, and rule over them well, as the Bible instructs men to do.  Eventually Satan will have the woman-controlled Beta-males at your local megachurch so thoroughly muzzled that you’ll have to ask those poor fools to blink twice if they don’t approve of the clothing-optional Sunday school class for polyamorous members.

Churchian men lack both the will and the loins to tell women to cover their heads when they pray, like God tells us in 1 Corinthians 11:3-10.  Instead they twist God’s word, to nullify God’s commandment, because their actual lord and master whom they serve, wants them to subvert God’s commands.  And they are far too cowardly to tell women to cover their heads, or even to modestly clothe over their tits and asses while at their church.  When the choice is between obeying God and telling women to cover their heads, versus obeying Feminists, who don’t want such a God-ordained symbol of subjection on a woman’s head, to whom does that “church” give the worth-ship to be followed?  The churchians consistently worship women, the creature, above their Creator.

Head is covered

The churches will foolishly fall into Satan’s trap and repeat the sin of Adam and hearken unto the voice of the woman, instead of God, almost every time, even though we are clearly warned against this at the very beginning of the Bible, and the whole earth was cursed because of that very sin.  But that’s no matter to those spiritual retards that mislead today’s whoring churches.  They’ll not only hearken unto the weaker vessels, they’ll go whoring after the government too.

In Kansas our ugly butch-haired Democrat Governess has ordered that all people must cover their faces when in public, presumably to slow the spread of a coronavirus.  And I have no doubt that churchians obediently snapped their face coverings on the very next Sunday after the exalted governess spoke her command.  Whereas these same churches have effectively told God to piss-off, when His word commands that women should cover their heads, and/or veil their faces as the original churches practiced, whenever women might be seeking God’s presence in prayer.  For 1900 years straight every church everywhere throughout Christendom insisted that the women wear head coverings.  But, no longer.

1 Corinthians 11:5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.  6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.  7 For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.

So, if God says that the head and visage of a man, who is the image of God his glorious Father, should not be covered during prayer, and the Governess orders men’s faces be covered in public, who do you suppose wins in their church when those orders collide during public prayer?  Did all the men take their muzzles off like they would remove their hats according to godly tradition?   Do we even have to ask whom those apostates obeyed, and whom they scorned?

Satan likes to get foolish men to dishonor God, and humiliate themselves.

Just 100 years ago our ancestor’s wives all covered their heads in obedience to God when they went to church or prayed.  And they also weren’t wearing skintight tops or bottoms.  But now these cowardly beta-male preachers pretend the gates of hell won’t prevail against their whoring “churches”, while their spiritual whorehouse’s doors are hell’s gateway.  Satan has already prevailed over them and is now driving a victory lap, while those ignorant men are praying with their faces covered.  They’re just blind guides, leading other blinded people into the pit.  Unless you also want to worship their hefty whores in skin tight clothes, don’t waste your time attending their apostate woman-hearkening training centers.  Start your own home church, where God is feared.

2 Corinthians 6:17 Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you.

Women – The Moral Weak Link

Women the Weakest Link

So why did a righteous God give men dominion and rule over women from creation?

So why did the subtle serpent, Satan, first tempt humanity to sin, via the woman?

Why was it the woman to first transgress a command of God’s?

So why was the earth cursed when the man harkened unto the voice of the woman?

Why didn’t the woman harken unto her husband Adam, and God?

Why are women never to usurp men?

Why does God still want women everywhere to adorn themselves with shamefacedness?

Why would God give young women a monthly reminder of their inherent uncleanness?

Because women are the moral weak link!

Women were created as weaker vessels, morally inferior, and in need of husbanding.

1 Timothy 2:8 I will therefore that men pray every where, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and doubting.  9 In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array;  10 But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works.  11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.  12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.  13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve.  14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.  15 Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.

Tertullian wrote: Do you not know that you are Eve? The judgment of God upon this sex lives on in this age; therefore, necessarily the guilt should live on also. You are the gateway of the devil; you are the one who unsealed the curse of that tree, and you are the first one to turn your back on the divine law; you are the one who persuaded him whom the devil was not able to corrupt; you so easily destroyed the image of God, Adam. Because of what you deserve, that is, death, even the Son of God had to die.

Women are the moral weak link.  Don’t ever act the fool by forgetting that.  Don’t sin like Adam by deferring to their weaker moral judgement.  Don’t serve women, and thereby serve Satan by following his favorite lure into defilement.

Luke 4:8 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve.

As men, our sex alone is the image and glory of God.(1 Corinthians 11:7) This is gloriously exemplified when you rule over your woman, in all things, as God created you and instructed you to do in His holy word.  Don’t let the usurper steal God’s glory by imagining any woman to be worthy of your service.  she certainly does not merit that “worth-ship”(which is the etymological source of the English word “worship”, circa 1300AD)

Exodus 34:14 For thou shalt worship no other god: for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God:

You, as men, however, are worthy of your wife’s service:

Colossians 3 :18 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as it is fit in the Lord.

It is fitting in the Lord, that she is commanded to serve you by God, as unto God, because you are the image of Christ, who is God:

Ephesians 5:22 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.  23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the savior of the body.  24 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.

Women are not the image of God, nor the glory of God,(1 Corinthians 11:7) but a morally weaker-link created fittingly to serve and satisfy men(the image of God) and yet women also serve God’s purpose to try men’s spirits and allegiance, which men must rationalize by faith to an intangible God, rather than giving allegiance to the tangible creature,(woman) who is to be by design the man-satisfying gift of God.  While women themselves, being a weaker vessel,(1 Peter 3:7) demonstrate whether or not they are loyal to an intangible God by the rationally simpler task of just showing their faith and allegiance by serving His tangible image, and seeing to it that she reverence God through reverencing His tangible image, her husband.

Ephesians 5:33 Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband.

Great Whore Gets Exposed

PedoPopeMobile

While searching WordPress for some truth, I stumbled upon a goldmine!   Here are four excellent posts explaining the Roman Catholic Church.  They are well worth reading, in order, especially if you are Catholic.  They are in English, as well as Spanish.  They’d be great to send to your favorite Catholic.

Debunking the Roman Catholic Church

Debunking the Roman Catholic Church, Part II

Debunking the Roman Catholic Church, Part III

Debunking the Roman Catholic Church, Part IV

Please share your reactions below.

Some things to chew on

Forgiven

I just came across an insightful post, that is well worth reading, about part of why we keep losing the culture war:

http://www.returnofkings.com/191761/conservatives-are-losers

I also came across this comment by Wintery Knight:

A while back I was asked to mentor a girl who had cohabitated with an atheist, had an abortion, and had become a Christian after they broke up. I asked her why women have premarital sex. And her answer was “it’s a way to get control over men, without having to be nice to them”. As a virgin myself, I am not interested in marrying a woman who used sex as a tool to manipulate men. That very quickly turns into sex-withholding in a marriage.

I believe Wintery Knight nailed it.  An ungodly woman will show respect and offer sex and make promises of unlimited sex, prior to marriage, to secure what she wants, but then once a loyal and devoted man is bound to her by marriage, then the ungodly woman’s manipulative power is secured through the wicked withholding and rationing of all that she vowed.

And once she has filed for divorce, you will get absolutely nothing but the opposite of what she vowed, while the bigoted cunt-court will force a man to continue to materially provide most every benefit the wife received during the marriage.

Stay strong my brothers!  Together we can become the biggest setback to Feminism since the invention of the sandwich!  And I plan to share some details about how we will do it, in an upcoming post.

Little Miss Can’t Be Wrong

 

gluttonousBlob

Our churches are full of idolatrous goddess worship.

These days women just do whatever they want, and they can count on their goddess worshipping churches to back all their wayward wanderings as if they were a holy pilgrimage.  Women are considered to be free from guilt and any true responsibility for all transgression.  Everything that might seem like a female sin, can be deflected and blamed on a man.  If you think you’re going to tell a churchian that your wife has wronged you, prepare yourself for an avalanche of blame and a flurry of goddess worship vomited back at you.  They do not truly believe that women really are ever outright guilty of an actual sin.  When you ask them point blank if women have a sin nature, and are capable of sinning on their own, they will reluctantly agree that women can sin, because they aren’t able to defend the preposterous reality of their true belief that women are nigh unto sinless.   The churchians will not confront a woman on behalf of her husband.  It just won’t happen.  No way!  The goddess is to be worshipped, not confronted.  About the only thing a woman might be confronted about, is if she has a role at the church that is beginning to steal the limelight from the arrogant pastor’s cult of personality.  He can’t have some vainglorious woman hogging the attention that he thinks should be focused on him.   Women can commit any sin and be excused for it.  Literally any sin.  All of the “seven deadly sins” are quickly excused.  A huge percentage of churchgoers are obese, especially women.  And what is obesity, if not proof of a sustained pattern of gluttony?  But don’t expect any fat women to be held solely responsible for their gluttony.  No, she binge eats because she is emotionally abused by men’s unrealistic expectations that women stay height/weight proportional.  She is an adulteress because her husband drove her into the arms of other men by behaving like a typical male.  She expects her “lazy” husband to be her helper doing her housework after his work, even though she is a stay at home mom, because she’s tired, after shopping for herself, and attending a women’s luncheon at church, she barely has the energy to watch her shows, and is definitely too tired to have sex with him.  You know, maybe if he was a better husband, she’d feel more like not berating him constantly.  /S

Women are natural defilers.

When there was no sin in the world, a woman, Eve, transgressed first, and then led her husband into sin.  That wasn’t a freak happening.  That was a woman acting according to her defiling nature.  That is why God wants women to be in subjection and shamefaced.  It is also why God wants women to have a quiet spirit and learn in silence.  The second transgression was a man, Adam, listening to his wife, and forgetting to listen to God instead.  God tells us in the Bible that is a pattern.   Men were made in the image and glory of God, and women defile men.

Revelation 14:4 These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb.  5 And in their mouth was found no guile: for they are without fault before the throne of God.

In the verses above I also note that the men who are not defiled with women speak no guile.  Speaking guile is pretty well required in dealing peaceably with women.  The quickest way to piss off women is to frankly speak truth to them.  And any man who speaks God’s truth without guile, is likely to remain a virgin, undefiled by women.

The only thing worse than goddess worshippers are their goddesses.

Miss Piggy

Today’s corn-fed church-led sows are a mockery of womanhood!   Puffed up with vainglory and often enough blubber to feed an Eskimo village, they are addicted to soliciting the unneeded approval of people, by attention whoring on social media, and constantly blabbering their vanity and lack of discretion when present.   They lack self-control, honesty, humility, modesty, chastity, loyalty, impartiality, charity, just about any other virtue you can think of, and any usefulness to others.  They are wicked by nature, and fully steeped in rebellion-entitling self-worship by nurture.  They are unfit to be wives and mothers, and they even consider being wives and mothers to be of secondary importance to indulging their blasphemous desire to be worshiped by others.  And they will not be redeemed, because they are not repentant.  Woe to these great beastly whores!  They lord themselves over men in the image of God.  The smoke of their torment will ascend up for ever and ever.

Down the cuckoldry rabbit hole and you’re into the church basement.

inchworm

So I’m exploring WordPress Reader, and it recommends an oddball post about the “science” behind cuckoldry.  And it piqued my curiosity because that is something that I sure as hell don’t understand.  Well, Sharkly bit the bullet, and read through it for you.   It was written by a slut who cuckolds her husband and claims to be a sex therapist who helps other couples enter into this same kind of cuckolding.  Firstly there really wasn’t any “science” cited, although she does repeatedly allude to “primate studies” as she profusely illustrates her post with pictures of Black men.  The pictures and article were such that even I won’t link to it. LOL   But it gets worse.  I tried to read some of this authors other articles on the subject, but my porn filter blocked all but one of them, so I’ll just address the two posts I was able to read.  This deluded slut uses speculation based upon her very non-standard view of evolution theory to arrive at the conclusion that wives should have a sex deprived Beta husband, who provides for and protects them, while the wives should also enjoy emotionally meaningless sex with a number of well hung studs.  The kicker is that the wife has to get the Beta husband onboard in order to keep a “good” marriage going with him.  While all of it was debauched, evil, and destructive to the family, there were some things that jumped out at me.

She firmly believes that women have higher sex drives than men.(likely the personal anecdotal evidence of a female sex addict, her insistence on the emotional meaninglessness of the outside sex is also a hallmark of sex addiction)  She believes that Patriarchy has perverted and inverted our sex roles, by keeping women monogamous.

The bomb drop ~ Step one to becoming a cuck!

Although she doesn’t give away her whole professional method for converting couples to cuckoldry, she does state that women dominate their husbands via sexual denial, and the first step to cuckoldry is getting the husband to willingly accept his wife’s denial of sex.   Wow!  It hit me like a ton of bricks.  I’ve heard that shit preached in church!   I’ve had that turd flung at me in “Christian marriage counselling”.

She says: Fortunately my husband does not see me as a “fallen woman”. On the contrary, he puts me on a pedestal. My husband considers me to be a white, blonde, Greek Goddess, and the more extramarital interracial sex I have, the more he adores and admires me.

In the comments she says:  It would be a big step in the right way if we could have a matriarchal society structure again so that a woman would be free to be intimate with other men if she wants to. 

regarding her cuckolded husband:

No, he believes that he is mortal – and that I am a Goddess.

And there you have it!   The church forces men to let their wives deny them sex with lame excuses.  The ‘great whore’ stole from men the exclusive image of God, and instead deifies women as men’s superiors.  Converting churchmen into ready cuckolds to slutty wives.  Our churches are a polluted fat whore, not the bride of Christ!

Eject!  Eject!  Eject!

The Image of God (the first & last men’s only club)

Did Sharkly jump out the “Overton window”?

out the window

Jack,  at Σ Frame linked to my How to bring back Patriarchy post.

In his description Jack hinted about the Overton window.   While I’m not certain what Jack was implying, I do have a response.

First I had to look up what the Overton window was.  While I was unfamiliar with the term, It was a familiar concept that I believe is quite true.  It refers to the range of ideas permitted in public discourse.  Often people, especially on the far left, will use the Door-in-the-face technique to modify the window of ideas which are acceptable, by publicly promoting leftist ideas that are currently far out of bounds to destigmatize less extreme leftist ideas that then seem to be an acceptable compromise by comparison.

So am I saying men are in the image of God while women are not, as a strategic ploy to move the center point of discussion to the right by yanking the extreme edge over further to the right?

No.  I actually believe every word I wrote, and I even held back a bit.

Now if all I accomplish is to move the Overton window to the right through the Door-in-the-face technique, that in itself will increase righteousness and be helpful to society, and will have been a good deed.  But I intend to do far more.  I’d actually love to see my plan followed and patriarchy restored.

Now if I were to bet on my success, I’d bet against Sharkly.  I’d bet that society continues to ignore God’s word, even when I proclaim it, and instead will try to censor me, mock me, and persecute me.  But the results are not mine to control.  So, I’ll just try to be a faithful servant of God, and serve him as best I can, in my own unique way that He has been preparing and equipping me to do.

 

separately, a commenter seems to wonder:

Am I just venting misogyny?

“…so bitter and resentful, almost hateful, of women.”

No, I don’t believe so.

If I really hated women I’d tell them to study for years in college preparing so they can waste their most fertile years and expel their freshest eggs while working in a factory or office, and then have to settle for whatever leftover men are still available, or else cats.   I’d tell them to be sexually liberated and get pumped and dumped by a string of immoral men who will later laugh about all the stupid whores they porked.  If I really hated women I’d flatter them that they’re equal or better than men, they’re “daughters of the King” made in the image of God, have a goddess inside them, and that they just need to “find themselves”.

No, I love women.  A lot!  I’ve even spent time carefully admiring pictures of women whom I don’t personally know, on the internet.  😉  And my love and appreciation for women is why I’m not hesitant to tell them what is truly best for them.  And it is best for women to truly know their place.  Woman was created last of all, for the man, God gave her to the man, to have.   The man was created in the image of God and as such comes before God, who’s image he bears, uncovered.  But the woman is just the glory of man, and must cover her head when coming into the presence of God, because she is not allowed this exaltation that is reserved for men who are all in God’s image and glory.

I also feel that women get too much flattery and aggrandizement in our Feminist society, and especially in our churches, having become veritable temples of cunt-worship.   So, out of love I generally try not to overinflate their already inflated sense of self.  I try not to apologize in advance before I say something putting women back in their place, nor do I want to sandwich it with a piece of praise.  Just, Whack!  Know your place woman!  That way the message doesn’t get lost.  I’m willing to be a rock of offense for God.

Let me have it below!  Your comments may help me or others.

Worshipping the Great Whore.

Church is a tit-pit

How the greater church became a Feminist tit-pit. 

The Bible teaches us that man was created in God’s image, and that God always and only reveals Himself as being of the masculine sex.  This original teaching has been replaced by various perversions, at many points in history, as false religion continually is raised up against the true one.   There is always just a small remnant who are on the narrow way, while the masses are being deceived and become lost.  The greater church is a counterfeit, a substitute, a Great Whore, drunk with the blood of martyrs.  The vast majority of the New Testament is warnings to us against false teaching.  Because there is always far more of that, than correct teaching.   The church of this age is a Great Whore which lusts after the world and is happy to be refilled continually with the satanic seed of neo-pagan goddess worship.

From the beginning God told us that He created man(Adam) in His own image.

Genesis 1:26a  And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness:

Genesis 1:27  So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

We are quite clearly told four times in a row in the first chapter of the first book of the Bible, that Adam(the first man) was intended to be and was made in God’s image or likeness.  It is foundational!  Then in a striking contrast we are told that God created male and female “them”(not just Adam) with no mention of it being done in God’s image.  God does not make foolish errors of omission when He writes.  It is important to note that the creation of the first female was a separate and later event after God had created Adam and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life.  So the phrase “male and female created he them.” is a summary statement telling of two separate events, including the creation of the first female, after Adam had already been made in the image of God.  The passage is like a legal product description.   We should only expect to find that which is clearly stated.

Man(Adam) = in the image of God created he him. 

Male and female = created he them.

The female, we are told, was just created by God, and there is no mention of her being in God’s image.  Nowhere in all 66 books of the Bible is there ever any statement that any earthly female is in God’s image.  While men’s state of being in the image of God, is retold many places throughout the Bible.  And the Apostle Paul clearly contrasts the man, made in the image and glory of God, with the woman, who was not to be uncovered, before God, like men, who naturally come before God bearing God’s own image and glory, and should not dishonor that by wearing a head covering.

1 Corinthians 11:5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven. For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered. For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man. For the man is not of the woman: but the woman of the man. Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.

So the Bible clearly tells, those of us with an ear to hear, that only men were created in the image of God, our Father.

Throughout the Bible, God always refers to Himself as masculine never as “it”.  He is Father, Son, and Spirit.  Although God is Spirit, God who never changes, clearly always identifies Himself as masculine.  Even His Spirit is clearly addressed as masculine(Him), and conceives masculine offspring.  The Bible never records God opening the womb of a childless woman and giving a daughter.  For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given:

  1. God gave to barren Sarah, Isaac.
  2. God gave to barren Rebekah, fraternal twin boys, Esau & Jacob, not a boy & girl.
  3. God gave to barren Rachel, Joseph.
  4. God gave to the barren wife of Manoah, Sampson.
  5. God gave to barren Hannah, Samuel.
  6. God gave to the barren Shunamite woman, a son.
  7. God gave to barren Elizabeth, John the Baptist.
  8. God gave the virgin Mary, Jesus.

Matthew 1:20 But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost.

God’s Spirit is male, not hermaphrodite.  One of Satan’s lies is that, “because God is Spirit, He can’t be male, but is both male and female, god and goddess.”

http://www.inplainsite.org/html/cult_of_the_goddess.html

http://www.inplainsite.org/html/bringing_forth_the_goddess.html

Satan delights to blasphemously emasculate God.  Ariana Grande and our culture like to blasphemously claim “God is a Woman”.

Boston University’s theologian Megan DeFranza affirms that all people are made in the image of God — male, female, and intersex.  Satan is still trying to bring God and men down, and women are still his primary vector for debasing men and supplanting God.

When God was actually made flesh, He(Jesus) was circumcised into the Abrahamic covenant committing men to God, at Jerusalem, on His eighth day, and this was attested to by the holy witnesses, Simeon and Anna.  Women are never circumcised to the true God, they are rightfully during this life the belonging of men, for whom they were created, and to whom they were given by God.

Genesis 3:12  And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.

Women are a God fashioned second class of human.  Eve was created to reverence the image of God, and to be a helper and mate for him, to stay under his dominion, being subject to him in everything.  When you forfeit that truth, you’ve lost God’s foundational truth setting up the intended basis for all families in Genesis 1.   Satan doesn’t want the image of God to be reverenced or served.  So his aim is to deceive us about the image of God.  How better, than to pretend the image of God is common to both sexes?  Thus men will no longer be given any such reverence from the lesser sex who are now mistakenly claiming to be our equal.

The ancients also once clearly held this as a foundational belief:

Aristotle’s biology gave ‘scientific expression’ to the basic patriarchal assumption that the male is the normative and representative expression of the human species and the female is not only secondary and auxiliary to the male but lacks full human status in physical strength, moral self-control, and mental capacity. The lesser ‘nature’ thus confirms the female’s subjugation to the male as her ‘natural’ place in the universe.

However, Satan is not content to just equalize and neutralize the two sexes that God created.  He wants to invert their order and subject men, in the image of God, to harken unto the voice of their wives and to obey them, just like he plotted in Adam and Eve’s very first sin.  It was tellingly, a Feminist role reversal, where male obeyed female over God, instead of Eve obeying Adam who had rightly commanded her, the command relayed from God, not to eat the forbidden fruit.  Eve was foolishly deceived into choosing to follow her own desires and to seek advancement, to be as gods, instead of listening to the restriction from God given through her husband.  Then she chose to tempt Adam into complying with her offer, to eat the fruit as well, instead of continuing to abide by God’s restriction.

Not only did the Apostle Paul teach us that Men are the image of God, but the early churches, taught by the Apostles, also unanimously believed that only men were the image of God.

Tertullian wrote about women:  And do you not know that you are Eve?  The sentence of God on this sex of yours lives in this age: the guilt must of necessity live too.  You are the devil’s gateway; you are the unsealer of that (forbidden) tree: you are the first deserter of the divine law: you are she who persuaded him whom the devil was not valiant enough to attack.  You destroyed so easily God’s image, man.  Because of the death you merited, even the Son of God had to die.

Augustine wrote:  “. . . woman was given to man, woman who was of small intelligence and who perhaps still lives more in accordance with the promptings of the inferior flesh than by superior reason. Is this why the apostle Paul does not attribute the image of God to her?”

“. . . the woman together with her own husband is the image of God, so that that whole substance may be one image; but when she is referred separately to her quality of help-meet, which regards the woman herself alone, then she is not the image of God; but as regards the man alone, he is the image of God as fully and completely as when the woman too is joined with him in one.”

It wasn’t until the fourth century around 380 AD that Mary began to be called Mother of God, or “Theotokos” This was said as part of the controversy over the nature of Jesus. Some said he was born human but became God later. Others said Jesus was divine from the moment of inception. Those who believed that Jesus was divine at birth used the slogan: Mary the Mother of God. Actually, the phrase was more like Mary: God-bearer. Saint Ambrose, who lived in Rome before going to Milan as its bishop, venerated Mary as an example of Christian life and is credited with starting a Marian cult of virginity in the 4th century.

In the 5th and 6th century, churches in Rome began to be dedicated to Mary, and from there the Great Whore seated on the seven mountains spoken of in Revelation 17 has continued to adopt features of preexisting pagan goddess worship and further deify Mary, growing in strength in the dark ages, eventually calling Mary the “Queen of heaven”, the same old name as Old Testament idol worshippers used when committing abominations in Jeremiah 7 & 44.  Somewhere early along our church age timeline to accepting Satan’s counterfeit goddess worship, it was decided that women must also be in the image of God, because, how could Mary be a goddess, if she isn’t even able to be in the image of God?  So women were deceitfully added into the image of God to bolster the worldly reintroduction of preexisting Roman goddess worship back into the church under the guise of “honoring” Mary.  Satan’s minions deceitfully said, “You’re dishonoring the ‘Mother of God’ if you say she was a sinner and wasn’t even in God’s image”.  Jesus was also the “Son of David” who freely admitted in Psalm 51:5 Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.  Jesus’ earthly parents did not need to be sinless, for him to live the only sinless life.  Jesus is the only one worthy to open the book mentioned in Revelation.  Mary is not His equal, not a goddess, not a co-redemptrix, not a Queen of Heaven.  Mary is not to be prayed to or worshipped, in competition with Christ the King of kings.  That is idolatry, recycled and repackaged pagan goddess worship from the deceiver.

Initially Protestantism threw off the worship of Mary, and greatly reformed the church, even Catholicism was reformed to some degree.  However, women were often still proclaimed to be in the image of God, and Chivalry and false romanticized notions of love still abound.  Christian “bridal mysticism” is taught rampantly.  Women are collectively reverenced in the churches while men are berated as a sex.  The dominion of the sexes has been turned on its head.  Wives even publicly threaten their husbands with “sleeping on the couch”(sexually immoral defrauding) if they don’t comply, in front of other presumed believers.   Wives no longer consider their husbands their “Lord” or to have been created superior in order for headship, and created for imaging God to the wife.  Even the “most conservative” churches are only conserving a weakened counterfeit of God’s design. Here is an example:

In 1998, the Southern Baptist Convention overwhelmingly approved the addition of an article on the family (Article 18) to the Baptist Faith and Message which states in part:

A wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband even as the church willingly submits to the headship of Christ. She, being in the image of God as is her husband and thus equal to him, has the God-given responsibility to respect her husband and to serve as his helper in managing the household and nurturing the next generation.

What a crock of crap!  If she is in the image of God as is her husband and is thus equal to him, then she doesn’t owe her husband anything more than “equality”.   Which is part of why marriage is becoming toxic for men, there is nothing in it for them, but insult to their manhood, great risk, and no reward, other than to be constantly manipulated by a sex trading whore who thinks she is equal or better than you, and deserves your reverence while satanically never giving you any of the reverence men are truly due.   If the husband is to exhibit the headship of Jesus Christ and the wife is supposed to submit “willingly” like the church, which one of them was created to be imaging their God, and which one is to be imaging the church?  The Southern Baptist’s silly compromised statement lacks cohesive sense, it blasphemously gives the image of God to women, and also sneakily adds a serving of servitude to confound the husband’s leadership role, while sneakily reducing the wife’s submission from, in everything by design, to only when willingly given, undercutting all efforts to discipline wayward wives or exercise any righteous compulsion of the wife who is under your charge.

This idolatrous goddess worship leads down the broad road to hell, as it always has.  One woman gave up humility and subjection by “finding herself” to be in the image of God:

“Pushing through the voices of shame has produced an incredible sense of freedom and agency as I explored my own voice. For me, this became an embrace of the imago Dei.” (image of God)

Matthew 10:39 He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it.

Jesus Said “Finding yourself” is the way to lose your eternal life.  You find eternal life by giving your own life up, even to the point of death, to live for the cause of Christ.  Women should be taught to find their secondary helpmate role, for Christ’s sake, not to go find their own life according to the world and popular psychology.  They are being led to self destruction, like lambs to the slaughter.

The Apostle Paul challenged the Ephesians to give up their “tit pit” goddess Diana, in Acts 19, why don’t we listen to Paul and do the same?

Diana of Ephesus

We as a church need to repent of emasculating God and blaspheming Him, by claiming women are also in His image, when He clearly never said that, and He is not a hermaphrodite or sexually dimorphic or intersexual.  God is our Father, not both our Father and mother.  He created us, He didn’t give birth to us.  It is time we men took back our birthright, that we so easily gave away, the image of God.  No woman can ever be my equal, here on this earth.  I was made superior, in the image of the Highest.  My duty to God takes precedence over my wife.  It is a woman’s greatest possible honor to have and be able to serve a husband of her own, and to become one flesh with him, thereby joining into the image of God that he already is.  If the Truth was taught, the sexes would relate more properly, and our children would have a safer more stable future.  Every woman who wants a husband, wants one she can look up to.  You don’t look up to an equal!  To satisfy female hypergamy, people must once again correctly realize men alone are in the image of God.  Every woman who marries a man, will marry up!  That truth should be comforting for them to learn.