The chief human enemies of Christ?

Jesus cleansing the templeIn Giotto’s c.1305AD Gothic/Proto-Renaissance fresco, shown above, Jesus Christ is illustrated clearing the merchants out of the temple while His haloed disciples watch and the religious leaders murmur against Him.

The merchants in the temple had turned the house of God into a den of thieves, but they could only have done this with the consent of their religious leaders.  The Romans crucified Jesus, but He was turned over to the Romans, to be crucified, by the High Priest of his own people.  Pontius Pilate asked Jesus (in John 19:10-11) “You do not speak to me? Do You not know that I have authority to release You, and I have authority to crucify You?”  Jesus answered, “You would have no authority over Me, unless it had been given you from above; for this reason he who delivered Me to you has the greater sin.”

So who did Jesus Christ argue with and rail against the most, the whores, the tax collectors, thieves, murderers, who?  We all know it was the Jewish religious leaders of that day that Jesus gave most of His condemnation.   Jesus was God’s “King of the Jews”, but His own religion’s leaders received him not.  They didn’t like His words, they didn’t like His ways.

Jesus of Nazareth King of the Jews  The replica sign shown above reads, “Jesus [of] Nazareth King [of the] Jews”.

Jesus Christ’s chief human enemies were the apostate religious leaders of His own religion.  But weren’t they Jewish in religion and following God’s laws?  Mostly, maybe 80-90%, but they believed enough false doctrine and traditions of men to mistake their own miracle working Messiah for a blasphemer.  Was it an honest mistake?  No, they had motive.  They didn’t want Jesus busting up their sacrifice selling cartel, questioning their traditions, proving He had God’s power to heal on the Sabbath, and teaching the people contrary to their doctrines, based upon the holy Scriptures.  Jesus was correcting their wicked ways and they wanted Him dead, all the while they claimed to be looking forward to the Messiah coming to rule over them.  But, He had come and the religious leaders didn’t want Him as ruler over them.

So how is this relevant to us today?

Well, as they say, “History repeats”.  Ecclesiastes 3:15(NLT) What is happening now has happened before, and what will happen in the future has happened before, because God makes the same things happen over and over again.

So will Christ allow the leaders of His “new” religion to again leave the truth of His word, and begin teaching doctrines they evolved to excuse their own waywardness?  Is the same King of the Jews who let the Jews become idolatrous and apostate and reject His ways, now as King of the Christians going to allow the church to become idolatrous and apostate and reject His ways?  Surely, you can’t be serious?Woke PastorDeuteronomy 32:18 You ignored the Rock who fathered you and forgot the God who gave you life.  Some translations do say “gave you birth”, but none use the pronoun “she”.  This retarded woman-worshiper has forgotten our eternal Father and is demoting God’s sex to suit his idolatrous Feminist beliefs.

Jeremiah 44:15-17a Then all the men which knew that their wives had burned incense unto other gods, and all the women that stood by, a great multitude, even all the people that dwelt in the land of Egypt, in Pathros, answered Jeremiah, saying,  16 As for the word that thou hast spoken unto us in the name of the Lord, we will not hearken unto thee.  17 But we will certainly do whatsoever thing goeth forth out of our own mouth, to burn incense unto the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto her, as we have done, we, and our fathers, our kings, and our princes, in the cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem.

So, could “Christian” churches again ignore Father God’s word and turn to giving idolatrous worth-ship to things feminine?  The following verse is soon about to happen:

Daniel 12:1(ICB) Daniel, at that time Michael, the great prince, will stand up. (He is the one who protects your people.) There will be a time of much trouble. It will be the worst time since nations have been on earth. But your people will be saved. Everyone whose name is written in God’s book will be saved.

The word “trouble” is listed in Strong’s Hebrew dictionary as word 6869 צָרָה Pronounced: (tsaw-raw’) a feminine noun that literally means: vexer, rival-wife, a female rival or adversary, and yet it also means trouble in a figurative sense. That Hebrew word has a more frequently used masculine version, but God said the less used feminine noun, perhaps to indicate the feminine vexing rivalry that is to be in that time of tribulation. Some feel that this was God’s way of warning us approximately 2,560 years ago, of the coming tribulation that is marked by the satanic evil of Feminism. Where God’s righteous patriarchal order has been completely thrown off and a defiling female-supremacist rival order, or Feminism, afflicts the sons of God’s people. I surely know Feminism has enabled the destruction of my family and now has my sons living without a father. However it is comforting to know that God not only foresaw this Feminist trouble, but that he warned us it would come upon us, before His deliverance of His people. God knows our “trouble”.  Commenter Feeriker once wrote:

Whenever I learn a new Hebrew word, the first thing I instinctively do is look to see if it is a cognate to Arabic.

This one definitely is. The Arabic word is. ثورة (“Thow’-rah” in classical standard Arabic, or sometimes pronounced “Sow’-rah”, or “Tow”-rah” in regional dialects such as Egyptian or Levantine).

The Arabs use it to mean “revolution” or “uprising,” a more powerful form of “trouble” or “disturbance,” which is DEFINITELY relevant to this topic.

Feeriker makes a good point. This female “uprising” or sexual “revolution” was long foretold as afflicting the sons of God’s people at the end of the age.  We can rest assured that God has this world under His watchful eye, and foreknew our Feminist trouble from the beginning.  And we who fight it, are fighting on God’s side, against the adversary of God.  So be of good courage!

1 Corinthians 11:7 For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.

So who are God’s worst human enemies today?

God’s chief enemies are again now our “Christian” spiritual leaders.  Like the Spiritual leaders at Christ’s first coming they have turned their worship centers into profit centers.  While they preach 80-90% of God’s word, they still join the Serpent in leading women into rebellion (“Ye shall be like God”) falsely claiming that women also image God the Father & Son, and were therefore created equal to men, thereby making marriage into a form of slavery where a man forces his equal into an unequal relationship as his helper.  They preach the exact same doctrine as anti-Christian Feminists, telling women to seek equality with, and to usurp, the image of God and telling men to hearken to the voice of the woman.  They’re replaying the role of the Serpent from Genesis 3.  They do the works of their father the devil.

Basically all of satanic Feminism was empowered by state sponsored church leaders in Rome declaring females to be in the image of God beginning around the end of the fourth century AD to allow Mary to be made co-equal with Christ and into a replacement goddess to offer to forcibly converted goddess worshippers.  Over a millennium later the Protestant reformation finally rolled back the deity of Mary, “the queen of heaven”, but today we still need reformers to roll back the image of God from off of women, so that wives can again rightfully and joyfully follow their clear superior, knowing that their husband is the image of the Lord Christ, the Good Shepherd, while wives don’t image God, but instead they image the ever straying church.

To restore God’s holy patriarchy we need to restore the fitting natural disparity between the sexes by reverencing exclusively fathers and sons as the image and glory of God the Father & Son.  By teaching men and women their correct respective standing and rank before God, men’s royal priesthood over their families can be restored, and marriage may again become a holy union operating according to God’s design.

Obviously laws and precedents would have to be reset, and governance returned to men, but the process of correct restoration of holy patriarchal governance begins with first understanding who God is, who we are, and how we all relate to God via His hierarchy. (1 Corinthians 11:3)

To make ready the way for Christ we must contradict the Feminist religious leaders of our day, who are Christ’s chief human enemies, and share the beautiful truth about our masculine God’s holy patriarchal kingdom where the Father, who is LORD of all spirits and all flesh, transfers all dominion to the Son.  So we as the images of God should seek to imitate God and transfer all of our society’s dominion into the hands of our sons, not leaving behind a society that is satanic, Feminist, and dysfunctional.  Amen!

Cunts Cancel Christian Clergyman

Brace yourselves men.  Atheists are now in control of what our nation’s pastors preach.  Why?  Because we let women rule over us.  The following link leads to a story about a pastor who got “Canceled” for advising women to endeavor to stay visually attractive for their husbands to bolster their marriages.  This pastor’s sermon was first pointed out and shrieked at by “Friendly Atheist” over at Patheos.  Later it was blasted by butch haired Reagan Williams who tells us that not only is Pastor Stewart-Allen Clark “toxic” to women, “he’s apparently extremely homophobic and transphobic too.” 

After these unsaved women began to publicly cunt-out over Pastor Clark’s practical sex-appeal sermon for women, then some of the woke media was also fed the story and blared it too.  As a result First General Baptist Church of Malden, Missouri now claims: “As of March 2, 2021, Pastor Stewart-Allen Clark has taken a leave of absence and is seeking professional counseling.”

Funny seal gasps

Sent to the reeducation camp!  So what horribly “toxic” things did this pastor say to incite his woke lynching?  Well, I listened to his sermon, and I personally was not offended by any of it.  Although he did spout the tiring & ungodly feminist fantasy of “perpetual courtship”, saying; “The chase ain’t ever over.”  But, I presume it wasn’t so much what he said, as how he said it.  Lots of quips holding women accountable for maintaining their beauty with very little gynogroveling or the profuse apologies that might ordinarily accompany even one such suggestion that women try improving themselves.  Furthermore pastor Clark has grown fat and his delivery was a little awkward.  So, much like how some people can’t “pull off” certain fashions, Pastor Clark was deemed by the woke trolls to be too fat and dorky to be telling wives to keep themselves beautiful for husbands like himself.  He was deemed unworthy to speak in such a way to wives.   They esteem themselves to have the worth-ship to be above any man’s correction, and certainly above an obese man’s correction.

Now if Pastor Clark had been a hawt panty-dropper with a way-cool delivery, he may have made many of these frigid harpies moist in the panties with his androcentric banter, and still be leading his church.  But, via many comments I read, I believe his biggest perceived “crime” was being fat himself, while instructing women not to be.

Pastor Clark also used Melania Trump as an example of a trophy wife who keeps herself attractive for her husband. 

Liberal heads exploding in …3…2…1… BOOM!

Sexy Melania Trump

Which would be your first lady?  

First Booty

Pastor Clark also said: “This is just the way God made us. Men have to have sexual intimacy or they’re not happy. It’s just the way it is.”  Presumably there are a few men with the “gift of celibacy”, but otherwise I’d have to agree.  Clearly my evil wife wasted our entire marriage intentionally trying to keep me unhappy.   

So where does this Feminist equality nonsense always derive itself from?

First General Baptist is a church in the General Baptist denomination, which released a statement Monday saying Clark’s sermon was “not consistent with the positions and values” of the organization.  “General Baptists believe that every woman was created in the image of God, and they should be valued for that reason,”…

The Image of God, men’s divine birthright, is falsely claimed by women and fraudulently touted to make them equal to fathers and sons who truly image God the Father and the Son.  And then, next thing you know, women are not only deemed equal to men, but women are treated like they are “more equal” than men.  And so men are not permitted to correct women.  But God never ever said women were made in His matchless image, like He so many times said men are.  And God, who chose to make two sexes, always clearly identifies Himself as the male sex.  And furthermore the Bible explains that women are a “weaker vessel”.  Not a strong vessel intended to carry the matchless image of God.  Instead of imaging God, women professing godliness are to be shamefaced and always in subjection.

1 Corinthians 11:7 For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.

Help Me Put My Boys’ Home Back Together

A Threefold Cord of Masculinity

My boys were all smiles after finally pinning their father during a wrestling match.

I need your help!

I am trying to get my wife’s church to put some pressure on my wife to get her to attend some joint counselling to address her Intimacy-Anorexia and to try to reconcile our marriage and our boys’ home.  However, being a typical churchian cult of woman-worship, it is going to take some serious effort to get them to ask my wife to submit to her husband and submit to getting the treatment she needs.  She, like a typical addict, is in denial about her behavioral addiction, and has been doing everything she can to avoid getting treatment to reverse the destruction her addiction has caused and the divorce it has led her to file.  There are other issues, with her spiritually, but I don’t think I’ll have any luck addressing them until she is free of the great bondage of the behavioral addiction that is blinding her to reality and keeping her emotionally and morally stunted.  I have tried addressing her spiritual issues in her current state and am not able to make any progress with her.  Currently she returns only evil for good and feels completely entitled to do so.  Her selfish insistence on staying in bondage to addiction is not fair to our boys who have seen their home and lives ripped apart, and are really suffering as a result of their broken home.

So, I have started a new website where I will be calling out my wife’s church, which has so far refused to do anything but cheer her on in her divorce.  At this point, I just have the first two posts up, but I will try to quickly get another 5 or so that I have planned written and up there in the next couple weeks.  Also I am going to publish them in a bit of an escalating fashion with the most damning posts coming towards the end of the posts that I currently have planned.  After those posts, I will make more geared towards teaching people what is wrong with churches like that, and how a church that follows God should act.  I haven’t heard of this being tried before, but I’m going to see if I can get my wife’s church to at least pretend to be God followers for a bit.  I have been warned that it is hard to shame whores, so I don’t know if I’ll be able to make my wife’s church behave any better, but at this point I’m about out of time and don’t see the cunt-court being likely to help me get my wife the help she needs to put our family back together in the best interest of the children.

The moderation at the other site will be different, in that I won’t be allowing trolls to participate, since my family is on the line.  But, for all of the rest of you, I could sure use your help, by visiting the new site and commenting, following the new blog to show your support and get notified of new posts, and contacting the church.  I have the churches contact info on the sidebar.  I expect if they respond back to you, it will be with lies and excuses, as it has been their pattern, just ignore their excuses, and take their slander with a grain of salt.  I’m sure my wife has told them lies, and they seem to really want to believe all women about everything.  Also, since they worship women, it would help if I also got a lot of participation from women, because that might give them the “moral backing” to hold one “goddess” accountable to scripture, if a bunch of other women are asking them to.

Please read the “My Marriage” post first, as it lays out the overall story.  Feel free to ask questions or leave comments here as well.  I gave those hirelings over 2 years to handle this privately, but they continually refused, so now I’ll be turning a light on those roaches and exposing their wickedness.  Help me stomp them!

Little Miss Can’t Be Wrong

 

gluttonousBlob

Our churches are full of idolatrous goddess worship.

These days women just do whatever they want, and they can count on their goddess worshipping churches to back all their wayward wanderings as if they were a holy pilgrimage.  Women are considered to be free from guilt and any true responsibility for all transgression.  Everything that might seem like a female sin, can be deflected and blamed on a man.  If you think you’re going to tell a churchian that your wife has wronged you, prepare yourself for an avalanche of blame and a flurry of goddess worship vomited back at you.  They do not truly believe that women really are ever outright guilty of an actual sin.  When you ask them point blank if women have a sin nature, and are capable of sinning on their own, they will reluctantly agree that women can sin, because they aren’t able to defend the preposterous reality of their true belief that women are nigh unto sinless.   The churchians will not confront a woman on behalf of her husband.  It just won’t happen.  No way!  The goddess is to be worshipped, not confronted.  About the only thing a woman might be confronted about, is if she has a role at the church that is beginning to steal the limelight from the arrogant pastor’s cult of personality.  He can’t have some vainglorious woman hogging the attention that he thinks should be focused on him.   Women can commit any sin and be excused for it.  Literally any sin.  All of the “seven deadly sins” are quickly excused.  A huge percentage of churchgoers are obese, especially women.  And what is obesity, if not proof of a sustained pattern of gluttony?  But don’t expect any fat women to be held solely responsible for their gluttony.  No, she binge eats because she is emotionally abused by men’s unrealistic expectations that women stay height/weight proportional.  She is an adulteress because her husband drove her into the arms of other men by behaving like a typical male.  She expects her “lazy” husband to be her helper doing her housework after his work, even though she is a stay at home mom, because she’s tired, after shopping for herself, and attending a women’s luncheon at church, she barely has the energy to watch her shows, and is definitely too tired to have sex with him.  You know, maybe if he was a better husband, she’d feel more like not berating him constantly.  /S

Women are natural defilers.

When there was no sin in the world, a woman, Eve, transgressed first, and then led her husband into sin.  That wasn’t a freak happening.  That was a woman acting according to her defiling nature.  That is why God wants women to be in subjection and shamefaced.  It is also why God wants women to have a quiet spirit and learn in silence.  The second transgression was a man, Adam, listening to his wife, and forgetting to listen to God instead.  God tells us in the Bible that is a pattern.   Men were made in the image and glory of God, and women defile men.

Revelation 14:4 These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb.  5 And in their mouth was found no guile: for they are without fault before the throne of God.

In the verses above I also note that the men who are not defiled with women speak no guile.  Speaking guile is pretty well required in dealing peaceably with women.  The quickest way to piss off women is to frankly speak truth to them.  And any man who speaks God’s truth without guile, is likely to remain a virgin, undefiled by women.

The only thing worse than goddess worshippers are their goddesses.

Miss Piggy

Today’s corn-fed church-led sows are a mockery of womanhood!   Puffed up with vainglory and often enough blubber to feed an Eskimo village, they are addicted to soliciting the unneeded approval of people, by attention whoring on social media, and constantly blabbering their vanity and lack of discretion when present.   They lack self-control, honesty, humility, modesty, chastity, loyalty, impartiality, charity, just about any other virtue you can think of, and any usefulness to others.  They are wicked by nature, and fully steeped in rebellion-entitling self-worship by nurture.  They are unfit to be wives and mothers, and they even consider being wives and mothers to be of secondary importance to indulging their blasphemous desire to be worshiped by others.  And they will not be redeemed, because they are not repentant.  Woe to these great beastly whores!  They lord themselves over men in the image of God.  The smoke of their torment will ascend up for ever and ever.

When did Feminism Start?

 

Strangling a Feminist

Commenter ‘Ace’ recently commented: “This is an attitude from the 1700s, so well before feminism took hold.”

Upon reading that I knew I wanted to respond with a post, but I had to go to work and I am now finally able to quickly address this.  However, in the intervening time, commenter ‘ikr’ gave the following reply: “To borrow recently-coined terminology, you further commit a strawwoman argument in arguing feminism, when the issue is gynocentrism. It was known as chivalry before that. The terms belong to eras, but the concept is the same: woman as the central figure in the concern of man.”

Commenter ‘ikr’ largely stole my thunder, by getting my main point across in a nutshell, but I’ll make the argument that “Feminism” goes all the way back to Eve, and that coveting equality with your superior, usurping, and rebellion, that are key features of Feminism, can be traced back to the fall of Lucifer.

 Isaiah 14:12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!  13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:  14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the Most High.

Genesis 3:4  And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely dieFor God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.

Genesis 3:17 And unto Adam He said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;  18 Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;  19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.

A while prior to Ace’s assertion of the 1700s being well before Feminism, commenter ‘ray’ had remarked: “I mean there’s no such thing as equality, in heaven or upon Earth, amongst man or woman or angel. Within these ranks there is Created order, each different and having a place or station.   Equality is an abstraction, a construction or artifice, created by Lucifer. The parallel between what happened in the Garden (Eve and quest for Equality) and today’s spiritual and political landscapes isn’t accidental.”

I previously explained a bit about how the Roman state church wrongly added women to the image of God around the end of the fourth century AD in another post: https://laf443259520.wordpress.com/2019/05/18/worshipping-the-great-whore/?wref=tp

It wasn’t until the fourth century around 380 AD that Mary began to be called Mother of God, or “Theotokos” This was said as part of the controversy over the nature of Jesus. Some said he was born human but became God later. Others said Jesus was divine from the moment of inception. Those who believed that Jesus was divine at birth used the slogan: Mary the Mother of God. Actually, the phrase was more like Mary: God-bearer. Saint Ambrose, who lived in Rome before going to Milan as its bishop, venerated Mary as an example of Christian life and is credited with starting a Marian cult of virginity in the 4th century.

In the 5th and 6th century, churches in Rome began to be dedicated to Mary, and from there the Great Whore seated on the seven mountains spoken of in Revelation 17 has continued to adopt features of preexisting pagan goddess worship and further deify Mary, growing in strength in the dark ages, eventually calling Mary the “Queen of heaven”, the same old name as Old Testament idol worshippers used when committing abominations in Jeremiah 7 & 44.  Somewhere early along our church age time line to accepting Satan’s counterfeit goddess worship, it was decided that women must also be in the image of God, because, how could Mary be a goddess, if she isn’t even able to be in the image of God?  So women were deceitfully added into the image of God to bolster the worldly reintroduction of preexisting Roman goddess worship back into the church under the guise of “honoring” Mary.  Satan’s minions deceitfully said, “You’re dishonoring the ‘Mother of God’ if you say she was a sinner and wasn’t even in God’s image”.

I think we would be unwise not to recognize that most all of the necessary components for todays ‘Feminism’ were conjured into place, by the Great Whore (Satan’s state church, of this world) even well before it was called ‘Chivalry’.

Please add your thoughts for discussion below.  🙂

Weddings: a Rite of the Patriarchy?

I came across the following post warning about the “sexist” history of many aspects of contemporary wedding ceremonies: https://www.mic.com/articles/139845/7-surprisingly-sexist-wedding-traditions-we-should-change-immediately

I found the authors alarm to be amusing.  Who knew history was so politically incorrect?

If only the white dress was the lone part of the bride’s wardrobe steeped in the patriarchy. Unfortunately, the veil is just as guilty. 

Down the cuckoldry rabbit hole and you’re into the church basement.

inchworm

So I’m exploring WordPress Reader, and it recommends an oddball post about the “science” behind cuckoldry.  And it piqued my curiosity because that is something that I sure as hell don’t understand.  Well, Sharkly bit the bullet, and read through it for you.   It was written by a slut who cuckolds her husband and claims to be a sex therapist who helps other couples enter into this same kind of cuckolding.  Firstly there really wasn’t any “science” cited, although she does repeatedly allude to “primate studies” as she profusely illustrates her post with pictures of Black men.  The pictures and article were such that even I won’t link to it. LOL   But it gets worse.  I tried to read some of this authors other articles on the subject, but my porn filter blocked all but one of them, so I’ll just address the two posts I was able to read.  This deluded slut uses speculation based upon her very non-standard view of evolution theory to arrive at the conclusion that wives should have a sex deprived Beta husband, who provides for and protects them, while the wives should also enjoy emotionally meaningless sex with a number of well hung studs.  The kicker is that the wife has to get the Beta husband onboard in order to keep a “good” marriage going with him.  While all of it was debauched, evil, and destructive to the family, there were some things that jumped out at me.

She firmly believes that women have higher sex drives than men.(likely the personal anecdotal evidence of a female sex addict, her insistence on the emotional meaninglessness of the outside sex is also a hallmark of sex addiction)  She believes that Patriarchy has perverted and inverted our sex roles, by keeping women monogamous.

The bomb drop ~ Step one to becoming a cuck!

Although she doesn’t give away her whole professional method for converting couples to cuckoldry, she does state that women dominate their husbands via sexual denial, and the first step to cuckoldry is getting the husband to willingly accept his wife’s denial of sex.   Wow!  It hit me like a ton of bricks.  I’ve heard that shit preached in church!   I’ve had that turd flung at me in “Christian marriage counselling”.

She says: Fortunately my husband does not see me as a “fallen woman”. On the contrary, he puts me on a pedestal. My husband considers me to be a white, blonde, Greek Goddess, and the more extramarital interracial sex I have, the more he adores and admires me.

In the comments she says:  It would be a big step in the right way if we could have a matriarchal society structure again so that a woman would be free to be intimate with other men if she wants to. 

regarding her cuckolded husband:

No, he believes that he is mortal – and that I am a Goddess.

And there you have it!   The church forces men to let their wives deny them sex with lame excuses.  The ‘great whore’ stole from men the exclusive image of God, and instead deifies women as men’s superiors.  Converting churchmen into ready cuckolds to slutty wives.  Our churches are a polluted fat whore, not the bride of Christ!

Eject!  Eject!  Eject!

Grateful wives, holding back the arrival of the Feminist utopia.

Korean Boxwood

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/05/mothers-shouldnt-be-grateful-their-husbands-help/588787/

Darcy Lockman writes in The Atlantic, that wives, who are grateful for their husbands help in raising their children, are holding back the rewriting of gender rules necessary to arrive at somewhere different than where we currently are with vestiges of the patriarchy still haunting us.

Ordinarily I wouldn’t bother to read such an article, but, to generate content for my blog, I held my nose and read her short screed on your behalf.

Ms. Lockman discovers her grievance: For the past 20 years, research by the Bureau of Labor Statistics has consistently found that women employed outside of the home shoulder 65 percent of child-care responsibilities, and their male partners 35 percent. … In 2017, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development called the uneven distribution of unpaid labor between men and women in the home one of the most important gender-equality issues of our time. … MenCare, a fatherhood campaign working toward child-care parity in 45 nations, estimates that at the current rate of change, it will be another 75 years before women achieve gender equality in the home —a more optimistic figure than the 200 years the United Nations International Labour Organization predicted in March, on the eve of International Women’s Day. … Women’s gratitude is doubtless a result of the well-known, deeply felt fact that while domestic labor isn’t equal now, it was even less equal before. 

So, according to Ms. Lockman, the Feminism foiling gratitude is because many wives perceive a relative improvement in the distribution of child care responsibilities since the 80’s and 90’s.  Apparently Feminists are not to be prematurely grateful for getting what they want, because giving up their raging aggrieved state may slow the progress of achieving complete parity between the sexes in the child care role.

Andrea’s misplaced gratitude is not only common, but also an impediment to the elusive goal of equity in the home. … Gratitude is a brand of benevolent sexism, a force that repels change. To offer thanks for whatever contributions men happen to make reinforces the implicit idea that parenting is women’s work, that 65/35 is a very fine place to stop. … Only once gratitude is relinquished for righteous anger will gender rules in this realm be rewritten. Then we can land somewhere different: not grateful, only glad.

So, according to Ms. Lockman, ladies you should not ever be grateful for your husband’s help with child care, until complete parity is achieved in 75 – 200 more years.  Basically, you should express no gratitude for your husband’s help, ever!  So, ladies, Please stay aggrieved and filled with anger, because your individual marriage is not to be a joy filled pothole on the grim road to our future sexless society.  /s

 

Addendum:

Dalrock has now mentioned this story:

https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2019/06/18/gratitude-is-the-enemy-of-feminism/

However Lori Alexander gave it a better treatment, in this case:

https://thetransformedwife.com/gender-equality-in-the-home/

Hello, world!

LOL!   I think I’ve been to their church a few times.

Welcome friends!

I’m just experimenting with my blog right now, and I’ll probably make plenty of mistakes, so for now, feel free to post a comment about anything that comes to your mind, we’ll discuss it.  Any tips or pointers or preferences on operating the blog would be appreciated also.  Feel free to argue and rant and abuse any others who show up.  I don’t have a policy page up yet, but just follow WordPress’s policy about specific threats of violence.(they don’t approve) Keep them vague.  Feel free to try out the features.  If I have any features?  I didn’t pay a cent for anything yet.  See if you can post photos, or videos.  Preferably entertaining ones if in fact you can post them.  Also feel free to post self gratuitous links to your own stuff, and mention if you’d like me to link to your blog or hate-site, or whatever you’re pushing.  Stuff may take a while to post initially until I get your first post greenlighted.  I look forward to getting some of this blog administration stuff figured out, and getting on to becoming a rock of offence, stuck in the Feminists’ craw.