Getting the Word Out


Repeal the19th AmendmentHow to tell others about God’s loving plan of patriarchy?

Where I work I usually get a couple emails weekly about what the company is doing to empower women, or increase diversity.  Supposedly diversity of ideas is a good thing, and apparently you get it by hiring and promoting people who don’t look like myself.   LOL   However, even though my ideas are quite outside the mainstream, instead of being celebrated for such diversity of thought, I know I might be fired for sharing my diverse beliefs with some of the “diverse” people at work.  Although I do continually push the envelope at work, sharing more about Godly Sexism than anybody else I know there.

I bought the shirt, shown above, from Amazon and wore it yesterday.(not to work)  My boys were the first to ask me what the 19th amendment was.  And It gave me the chance to share with them  that the 19th amendment allowed women to vote in the USA.

Later I got to briefly share the calamity of women voting with a stocker at Walmart who asked me what the 19th amendment was.  He didn’t really say anything in return.  I assume he had been coached not to speak of his personal politics with customers.  But, his facial expression looked shocked, like he’d just had his pussy grabbed.

Our country has made a grave mistake by letting women “help” rule us.  And as expected, ideological politics descended from written platforms and whole speeches printed in newspapers, into glamour photos and quotable quips from the candidates.  Today we have memes and soundbites, but the effect is the same.  Both parties left off deep discussion of the candidates stances and ideas and effectively turned elections into beauty contests judged by flighty “undecided” women.

Giving women the vote also meant the inevitable passage of “women’s issues”, e.g. Abortion on demand,(babies are drawn & quartered in their mother’s wombs) No-Fault Divorce,(family men are absolutely ruined for No-Fault of their own) the Sexual Harassment campaign,(that criminalizes even the mildest pursuit and advances by unwelcomed men) Equal pay for twice the drama, and every imaginable perversion of virtue and justice along with a whole raft of freebies and carveouts designed to provide for women who don’t care to treat any man respectably enough to earn that provision from him.  So, women voting has brought a murderous reign of family devastation upon our nation and world, and I don’t see what we’ve gained by making women so entitled.

If we feel men were created by God to be the leaders, and run society in accordance with God’s will, then we need to be able to openly share those Godly ideas, before we can ever expect we’ll get others to agree with them and adopt them.

Red-Pill Religion?

Bnonn's Baby

Lately there has been some discussion of whether the “Red Pill” is Christian or not.   I think it is a fool’s debate, but here goes, I’ll wade in against the foolish.  Recently I read two somewhat opposing articles regarding this.  First I’ll deal with the foolish one: Bnonn throws the baby out.  Fence-riding Bnonn, at the Purple-Pill “It’s Good To Be A Man” takes a break from fighting his enemy ‘Blue-Pill feminist Status quo’ to take a swipe at his other enemy, ‘Red-Pill patriarchal wisdom’.  Bnonn begins by saying: “Our conviction is that, while the red pill shares certain commonalities with biblical Christianity, and often sees the nature of things more clearly than mainstream evangelicalism, it is actually a separate religion in its own right.”  So, Bnonn recognizes that there are some Biblical principles in the red pill, and that this truth leads Red-Pilled people to seeing the nature of things with greater clarity, but he then proceeds to ‘point and shriek’, branding this truth, this source of greater clarity, as a false religion, outlawing seeking this truth and wisdom from Christianity.  Now I’ll spare you the bulk of his bnonnsense, as the author is reduced to painting the red pill with a very broad brush, citing various individual foibles and some red-piller’s lack of Christian morals, and such,  as reason to advise his readers to shriek and run from any truth or wisdom that might be inherent in the Red-Pill movement, and to let men like himself do your thinking, and all consideration of it, for you.  As Bnonn so often does, his articles generally go into lengthy drawn out contortions to twist some unrelated tidbits into seemingly supporting his contentions, and apparently to either impress or baffle his readers  he opportunistically throws in the biggest and most arcane words that he knows, but in this article mainly he foolishly paints with an overly broad brush and throws the good out with the bad.  Bnonn concludes with: “Hence, we are not red pill Christians, and actively warn against the very idea of such a thing. We are Christians who have benefited from the observations of red pill thinkers about God’s creation, and are striving to integrate that knowledge into a positive biblical theology of masculinity, femininity, and how men and women are to work together to extend the dominion of the house of God.”

As you can see, Bnonn cleverly shifts dominion from individual men under the headship of Christ,(1 Corinthians 11:3) to the church, “the house of God”, of which he is a thought leader.  Bnonn’s preface and conclusion, given above, defines his ilk as Purple-Pill, and attempts to scare his readers off from becoming any more Red-Pilled than Bnonn himself.    He claims to be riding the fence at just the perfect balance point.  So as always, your ideas and discussion are not permitted there, just your donations, so they can afford to continue doing all your thinking for you, and in exchange they’ll limit your dominion a bit less than a more Feminist church.

Job 12:2 Truly ye are the people, and wisdom shall die with you!

Now on to the Good.

Over at Biblical Gender Roles, the host asks: Is Red Pill Biblical?

As you know, I myself, have been teaching that men are exclusively in the image and glory of God,(1 Corinthians 11:7) created preeminent, to be delegated divine dominion over women and all of creation, with the command to rule them well.  I have stated that we men have been deceived into trading our birthright ~ blessed Patriarchy, for a mess of dysfunctional Feminism.  This Bible based belief also fits well with the Red Pill.

The host quotes popular secular Red Pill Blogger, Rollo Tomassi as saying: The authority men used, to claim innate legitimacy [from] in the past, is now only legitimate when a woman wields it.  Men need to retake this authority and own it as is their birthright once again.”

I won’t dissect the Biblical Gender Roles article here, since it is worth reading for yourself.  I will however welcome all your discussion of it here.  I personally have found it difficult to get my comments to appear at BGR, and Bnonn’s article does not allow any comments at all.  Feel free to share your thoughts about whether the Red Pill movement contains wisdom and truth that our Feminist churches have been misled to currently try to deny, or any other thoughts.

The Servant-Leadership Scam

Creflo Dollar“Minister” Creflo Dollar exiting his previous business jet.

Definition (verb form) ~ Minister:

  • attend to the wants and needs of others
  • to give help to or care for people
  • to give aid or service, e.g. minister to the sick
  • Etymology: from Latin minister, Meaning: servant

The prosperity preacher Creflo Dollar is notorious for asking his followers to buy him a top-of-the-line 65 million dollar business jet, after his jet pictured above was damaged.  You can read about more of his profligate antics at this, Not Safe For Work (NSFW) link: Daily Mail Online ~ Creflo Dollar

In another widely publicized story Dollar was once booked into jail for beating his 15 year old daughter in order to keep the indiscretionate young lady from going out partying.  As one commenter amusingly put it: “It sounds like Dollar was trying to knock some cents into the girl.”

Where does the always misapplied concept of Servant-Leadership come from?

Mark 10:41 And when the ten heard it, they began to be much displeased with James and John.  42 But Jesus called them to him, and saith unto them, Ye know that they which are accounted to rule over the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and their great ones exercise authority upon them.  43 But so shall it not be among you: but whosoever will be great among you, shall be your minister:  44 And whosoever of you will be the chiefest, shall be servant of all.

Jesus was speaking to his twelve disciples, who were to become the first leaders of his “bride” the church.  Christ is the Head or Husband of the church, but while the Bridegroom is away, prior to His marriage feast, He has entrusted His bride to the care and ministry of various men.  These men are not ordained to be interloping heads over Christ’s bride, but to be servants of Christ’s bride on Christ’s behalf.

Ephesians 5:22 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.  23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.  24 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.

Clearly Christ is the true Head of the church.   Husbands are the image of Christ, and are not to be without lordship in their own homes, while the leaders of the church are not its head, because Christ is the only head of the church.  Ministers are to be the servants of the other men of the church, out of love for the brotherhood of faithful men.  It is absolutely wrong of church misleaders, those greedy and power hungry charlatans, to forcibly foist their commanded servitude off onto husbands because that clearly reverses God’s word in multiple places, and husband’s need their lordship or families fall apart when wives are not obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed. (Titus 2:5)  So who do the men of the church report to?

1 Corinthians 11:3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.

The men of Christ’s church report directly to Christ, who is returning not to serve them again for another three years, but to rule with a rod of iron as omnipotent Lord for a thousand years.  We would do well to notice that Jesus’ earthly ministry will be less than a third of a percent of the time He spends ruling over us here on earth.  Although Christ came to serve and sacrifice and woo us to himself, as Christ cried out on the cross, “It is Finished!”  He quickly commissioned His church leaders and then ascended into glory.  His sacrificial work is done!

So how do churchmen relate to each other within the church since none is the head and ruler, but Christ?

Ephesians 5:21 Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.

So as we have seen from Ephesians 5 Christ and husbands are to be submitted to in everything.  So is Christ not now our own personal servant?  Our SERVANT-leader?

Revelation 22:3 And there shall be no more curse: but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it; and His servants shall serve Him:

What!  Servants serving!  That’s crazy talk!  Next you will say that men’s helpers should be helping men, instead of demanding men serve them via misappropriating “servant leadership”. /S

Well, what does Dollar say?

And now we’ll look at this word “Ruleth” because leadership, “Obey them that have the rule over you,” it must be servant type of leadership. It’s the servant leader that God wants to put in the lives of people. It’s the servant leader. … Your house needs leadership. Your children need leadership. But I’m learning that my leadership has increased because I understand that real leadership is serving. When I serve my wife, that’s leadership.

Dollar then goes on to mock men who actually want to rule their families, as God commands, as being insecure control-freaks.

The heart of the matter.

So Creflo Dollar serves his poor congregation from his mansion, his Rolls Royce, his Bentley, his business jet,(Apparently you need a lot of exquisite transportation to get to your needy neighbors these days.) while browbeating husbands into the servitude that God intended for church ministers like himself, and impugning husband’s motives for just wanting enough influence to keep their own daughters from going partying without getting themselves booked into jail like Dollar.  I think we can all see that this clown is a hypocrite, and that the people who give money to his prosperity “gospel” gimmickry are duped by their own greedy desire to get rich like their idol, Mr. Dollar.

But!  You say: Surely my modest-income minister who preaches that husband’s should be servant-leaders is not as bad as crazy Creflo, right?

Wrong!  He is just as worthless a false teacher, and he sucks at it too, because Creflo is getting all the perks while your fool “minister” serves Satan for next to nothing because his skills don’t get him the higher pay scale of a sharp con like Dollar.  These false teachers who pervert God’s word and destroy God’s patriarchal design for families, their portion is entirely in this life.  If they don’t get for themselves the nice things in this life, they’re both evil and lazy.

An Epiphany of Male Superiority

Vagina Voice

The epiphany:

A few days ago my long-divorcing wife and I had a thought provoking verbal exchange.   Upon our first meet-up that day I reminded her that she was headed to hell, and that she needed to repent, as any good spiritual leader would.   Later that evening when we met-up again, she went off on one of her tirades.  Among her first loud charges was the accusation that I think women are inferior.    LOL  She hollered it like she was charging me with arrogant blasphemy.  She continued to verbally lambaste me and got way louder as she ran off, so that I really didn’t get a chance to respond.  She likes to get the last word that way – she screams some charge against my character and then slams the door, usually.   She is a master of shutting down discussion, and always has to get the last word.   Anyhow…

Once upon a blue-pilled time, I might have interjected, “that’s not true”, or tried to show that my words and actions were necessary and reasonable, and not male chauvinistic.  But as she was ranting on, and I was thinking about how I might respond if I ever was able to get a word in, I realized; she’s right.  I do now think women are inferior to men.  And not just because of her accompanying show of spoiled behavior.  LOL   I think God made the woman as a lesser vessel, not in the image of God, with the mission to help and reverence her man, when she is behaving well, and to test men’s faithfulness to God when she misbehaves.

It really was a blissful enlightenment, to acknowledge to myself, that I do firmly know that women are currently categorically inferior by way of creation and divinely assigned rank to all of us menfolk, and that I needed to just come out and own it more thankfully publicly, that I, as a man, was made for preeminence, as an image, or representative figure, of God, and bestowed with some portion of His divine glory.

I no longer need to be on the defensive, and prove I believe in equality.  I can respond to the charge of thinking women are inferior, by going on the offensive and declaring, I know I am superior, a great gift was bestowed on me by God, who fearfully and wonderfully made me a glorious likeness of Himself, to rule over women in His divine stead.   And you, woman, by your insolence and your ignorance of your own rank and place, you prove that your inherent inferiority is well merited by how unworthily you even still conduct yourself, by putting on airs in the presence of your superiors, when you should rightly be showing humility and genuflection.

If it had been the husbands asked to be subject to their wives by God , the husbands wouldn’t fail so incompetently to be of excellent service.

No, the husband is the rightful head, because he is the most noble aspect of humankind, and best fit to command women and children with his discernment.  All children should honor their parents.  Every husband should be honored as the God ordained and inherently superior shepherd of his own household, that the gospel of Jesus Christ may be exalted.  So also should every man honor Jesus Christ as his Lord, thereby directing all human honor and allegiance rightfully upward, ascending ultimately to the glory of the Supreme Father.   Amen!

When did Feminism Start?


Strangling a Feminist

Commenter ‘Ace’ recently commented: “This is an attitude from the 1700s, so well before feminism took hold.”

Upon reading that I knew I wanted to respond with a post, but I had to go to work and I am now finally able to quickly address this.  However, in the intervening time, commenter ‘ikr’ gave the following reply: “To borrow recently-coined terminology, you further commit a strawwoman argument in arguing feminism, when the issue is gynocentrism. It was known as chivalry before that. The terms belong to eras, but the concept is the same: woman as the central figure in the concern of man.”

Commenter ‘ikr’ largely stole my thunder, by getting my main point across in a nutshell, but I’ll make the argument that “Feminism” goes all the way back to Eve, and that coveting equality with your superior, usurping, and rebellion, that are key features of Feminism, can be traced back to the fall of Lucifer.

 Isaiah 14:12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!  13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:  14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the Most High.

Genesis 3:4  And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely dieFor God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.

Genesis 3:17 And unto Adam He said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;  18 Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;  19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.

A while prior to Ace’s assertion of the 1700s being well before Feminism, commenter ‘ray’ had remarked: “I mean there’s no such thing as equality, in heaven or upon Earth, amongst man or woman or angel. Within these ranks there is Created order, each different and having a place or station.   Equality is an abstraction, a construction or artifice, created by Lucifer. The parallel between what happened in the Garden (Eve and quest for Equality) and today’s spiritual and political landscapes isn’t accidental.”

I previously explained a bit about how the Roman state church wrongly added women to the image of God around the end of the fourth century AD in another post:

It wasn’t until the fourth century around 380 AD that Mary began to be called Mother of God, or “Theotokos” This was said as part of the controversy over the nature of Jesus. Some said he was born human but became God later. Others said Jesus was divine from the moment of inception. Those who believed that Jesus was divine at birth used the slogan: Mary the Mother of God. Actually, the phrase was more like Mary: God-bearer. Saint Ambrose, who lived in Rome before going to Milan as its bishop, venerated Mary as an example of Christian life and is credited with starting a Marian cult of virginity in the 4th century.

In the 5th and 6th century, churches in Rome began to be dedicated to Mary, and from there the Great Whore seated on the seven mountains spoken of in Revelation 17 has continued to adopt features of preexisting pagan goddess worship and further deify Mary, growing in strength in the dark ages, eventually calling Mary the “Queen of heaven”, the same old name as Old Testament idol worshippers used when committing abominations in Jeremiah 7 & 44.  Somewhere early along our church age time line to accepting Satan’s counterfeit goddess worship, it was decided that women must also be in the image of God, because, how could Mary be a goddess, if she isn’t even able to be in the image of God?  So women were deceitfully added into the image of God to bolster the worldly reintroduction of preexisting Roman goddess worship back into the church under the guise of “honoring” Mary.  Satan’s minions deceitfully said, “You’re dishonoring the ‘Mother of God’ if you say she was a sinner and wasn’t even in God’s image”.

I think we would be unwise not to recognize that most all of the necessary components for todays ‘Feminism’ were conjured into place, by the Great Whore (Satan’s state church, of this world) even well before it was called ‘Chivalry’.

Please add your thoughts for discussion below.  🙂

Weddings: a Rite of the Patriarchy?

I came across the following post warning about the “sexist” history of many aspects of contemporary wedding ceremonies:

I found the authors alarm to be amusing.  Who knew history was so politically incorrect?

If only the white dress was the lone part of the bride’s wardrobe steeped in the patriarchy. Unfortunately, the veil is just as guilty. 

The Image of God (the first & last men’s only club)

Did Sharkly jump out the “Overton window”?

out the window

Jack,  at Σ Frame linked to my How to bring back Patriarchy post.

In his description Jack hinted about the Overton window.   While I’m not certain what Jack was implying, I do have a response.

First I had to look up what the Overton window was.  While I was unfamiliar with the term, It was a familiar concept that I believe is quite true.  It refers to the range of ideas permitted in public discourse.  Often people, especially on the far left, will use the Door-in-the-face technique to modify the window of ideas which are acceptable, by publicly promoting leftist ideas that are currently far out of bounds to destigmatize less extreme leftist ideas that then seem to be an acceptable compromise by comparison.

So am I saying men are in the image of God while women are not, as a strategic ploy to move the center point of discussion to the right by yanking the extreme edge over further to the right?

No.  I actually believe every word I wrote, and I even held back a bit.

Now if all I accomplish is to move the Overton window to the right through the Door-in-the-face technique, that in itself will increase righteousness and be helpful to society, and will have been a good deed.  But I intend to do far more.  I’d actually love to see my plan followed and patriarchy restored.

Now if I were to bet on my success, I’d bet against Sharkly.  I’d bet that society continues to ignore God’s word, even when I proclaim it, and instead will try to censor me, mock me, and persecute me.  But the results are not mine to control.  So, I’ll just try to be a faithful servant of God, and serve him as best I can, in my own unique way that He has been preparing and equipping me to do.


separately, a commenter seems to wonder:

Am I just venting misogyny?

“…so bitter and resentful, almost hateful, of women.”

No, I don’t believe so.

If I really hated women I’d tell them to study for years in college preparing so they can waste their most fertile years and expel their freshest eggs while working in a factory or office, and then have to settle for whatever leftover men are still available, or else cats.   I’d tell them to be sexually liberated and get pumped and dumped by a string of immoral men who will later laugh about all the stupid whores they porked.  If I really hated women I’d flatter them that they’re equal or better than men, they’re “daughters of the King” made in the image of God, have a goddess inside them, and that they just need to “find themselves”.

No, I love women.  A lot!  I’ve even spent time carefully admiring pictures of women whom I don’t personally know, on the internet.  😉  And my love and appreciation for women is why I’m not hesitant to tell them what is truly best for them.  And it is best for women to truly know their place.  Woman was created last of all, for the man, God gave her to the man, to have.   The man was created in the image of God and as such comes before God, who’s image he bears, uncovered.  But the woman is just the glory of man, and must cover her head when coming into the presence of God, because she is not allowed this exaltation that is reserved for men who are all in God’s image and glory.

I also feel that women get too much flattery and aggrandizement in our Feminist society, and especially in our churches, having become veritable temples of cunt-worship.   So, out of love I generally try not to overinflate their already inflated sense of self.  I try not to apologize in advance before I say something putting women back in their place, nor do I want to sandwich it with a piece of praise.  Just, Whack!  Know your place woman!  That way the message doesn’t get lost.  I’m willing to be a rock of offense for God.

Let me have it below!  Your comments may help me or others.

How to bring back Patriarchy.


The simple truth.

The respect society gives to men, in general, is regulated and set by two factors:

  1. Society’s beliefs about men and what they deserve.
  2. What men have been conditioned to expect, and what they willingly endure.

The second factor, what men expect and tolerate, adjusts with and is set by the first factor, which makes the first factor ultimately the determinant factor.

How it was.

Men have historically been understood to be superior to women and children in Patriarchal societies.  This unquestioned belief in male superiority, kept those societies Patriarchal and wanting all male leadership for everyone’s benefit.

How it works.

Beliefs regarding the sexes relative superiority and inferiority leads to society becoming correspondingly Patriarchal, Egalitarian, or Matriarchal.

What went wrong.

It was the gradual introduction of the belief in equality of the sexes that led women to clamor for men’s rights, for men’s positions, and to despise men’s dominion over them.  Furthermore it was the belief in equality of the sexes that led men to give women the rights held by men, to allow women to take men’s former positions, and to share responsibilities, like voting, that belonged to men.   The false notion that men and women were created equal, even interchangeable, has made our families fall into chaos.  You can’t have a democracy of two.  In marriage, equality is a recipe for conflict.

What must change.

Any intended return to a society that respects male dominated leadership and respects men in general, must be preceded by a societal return to the belief in male superiority.   That belief is necessary to put back into effect and keep in effect the desired change in civil society.  If men are not believed to be superior, then male dominated leadership is considered corrupt, arrogant, usurping, and missing half of the best talent.  Every Patriarchal society is of necessity built on the foundational truth that men are superior, and are therefore deserving of the superior role, and superior regard.  The ancients clearly knew that men were superior.  Aristotle states, “as regards the sexes, the male is by nature superior and the female inferior, the male ruler and the female subject”.  Once upon a time the church unanimously believed that men were created first, and only men were created in the image of God.  Men were therefore known to be superior, known to be due greater respect, and expected to rule over women.   Men must reclaim their superiority, the image of God, and the divine right to rule that comes with it.

Feminism Backlash (rant)

Yesterday was my youngest son’s 11th birthday party.  I bet it was a nice party.  I currently get to see my two sons every second weekend.  Last weekend when my wife was picking my sons up from my house, I overheard my youngest son arguing and pleading with his mom about her allowing him to invite anybody but his father to his birthday party.   It broke my heart to hear my son having to fight to try to keep his father in his life, and knowing already how the system is unbeatably rigged against us males.

Now you might imagine that I have done some horrendous things, for a father to be kept from his sons like I have been, but sadly that isn’t even the case.  I’ve never even been charged with a misdemeanor in my whole life.  Yet I was kept from my sons, except for some rare brief instances under supervision for nine months, based upon false accusations from my wife who has three diagnosed mental disorders.  Was I or my son’s compensated in any way when my wife’s accusations were fully disproven, twice over?  No, we’ll never get that time back, or the thousands of dollar it took to disprove things that never happened.  Unfortunately I am forced to go to work every week, at a job I now hate, to pay for my wife to live with my kids in a second home I have to provide and have parties I can’t attend, Etc. Etc.  You get the picture.

If Feminism had a headquarters, I’d pay my last dime for the first spot in line to destroy it.   Don’t even build Cunt-Con.  I swear, I’ll destroy it!   I want to beat those stupid sows back into the stone age with a rod of iron!  It is the least I can do for my sons, and millions of other boys growing up fatherless like them.

Worshipping the Great Whore.

Church is a tit-pit

How the greater church became a Feminist tit-pit. 

The Bible teaches us that man was created in God’s image, and that God always and only reveals Himself as being of the masculine sex.  This original teaching has been replaced by various perversions, at many points in history, as false religion continually is raised up against the true one.   There is always just a small remnant who are on the narrow way, while the masses are being deceived and become lost.  The greater church is a counterfeit, a substitute, a Great Whore, drunk with the blood of martyrs.  The vast majority of the New Testament is warnings to us against false teaching.  Because there is always far more of that, than correct teaching.   The church of this age is a Great Whore which lusts after the world and is happy to be refilled continually with the satanic seed of neo-pagan goddess worship.

From the beginning God told us that He created man(Adam) in His own image.

Genesis 1:26a  And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness:

Genesis 1:27  So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

We are quite clearly told four times in a row in the first chapter of the first book of the Bible, that Adam(the first man) was intended to be and was made in God’s image or likeness.  It is foundational!  Then in a striking contrast we are told that God created male and female “them”(not just Adam) with no mention of it being done in God’s image.  God does not make foolish errors of omission when He writes.  It is important to note that the creation of the first female was a separate and later event after God had created Adam and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life.  So the phrase “male and female created he them.” is a summary statement telling of two separate events, including the creation of the first female, after Adam had already been made in the image of God.  The passage is like a legal product description.   We should only expect to find that which is clearly stated.

Man(Adam) = in the image of God created he him. 

Male and female = created he them.

The female, we are told, was just created by God, and there is no mention of her being in God’s image.  Nowhere in all 66 books of the Bible is there ever any statement that any earthly female is in God’s image.  While men’s state of being in the image of God, is retold many places throughout the Bible.  And the Apostle Paul clearly contrasts the man, made in the image and glory of God, with the woman, who was not to be uncovered, before God, like men, who naturally come before God bearing God’s own image and glory, and should not dishonor that by wearing a head covering.

1 Corinthians 11:5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven. For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered. For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man. For the man is not of the woman: but the woman of the man. Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.

So the Bible clearly tells, those of us with an ear to hear, that only men were created in the image of God, our Father.

Throughout the Bible, God always refers to Himself as masculine never as “it”.  He is Father, Son, and Spirit.  Although God is Spirit, God who never changes, clearly always identifies Himself as masculine.  Even His Spirit is clearly addressed as masculine(Him), and conceives masculine offspring.  The Bible never records God opening the womb of a childless woman and giving a daughter.  For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given:

  1. God gave to barren Sarah, Isaac.
  2. God gave to barren Rebekah, fraternal twin boys, Esau & Jacob, not a boy & girl.
  3. God gave to barren Rachel, Joseph.
  4. God gave to the barren wife of Manoah, Sampson.
  5. God gave to barren Hannah, Samuel.
  6. God gave to the barren Shunamite woman, a son.
  7. God gave to barren Elizabeth, John the Baptist.
  8. God gave the virgin Mary, Jesus.

Matthew 1:20 But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost.

God’s Spirit is male, not hermaphrodite.  One of Satan’s lies is that, “because God is Spirit, He can’t be male, but is both male and female, god and goddess.”

Satan delights to blasphemously emasculate God.  Ariana Grande and our culture like to blasphemously claim “God is a Woman”.

Boston University’s theologian Megan DeFranza affirms that all people are made in the image of God — male, female, and intersex.  Satan is still trying to bring God and men down, and women are still his primary vector for debasing men and supplanting God.

When God was actually made flesh, He(Jesus) was circumcised into the Abrahamic covenant committing men to God, at Jerusalem, on His eighth day, and this was attested to by the holy witnesses, Simeon and Anna.  Women are never circumcised to the true God, they are rightfully during this life the belonging of men, for whom they were created, and to whom they were given by God.

Genesis 3:12  And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.

Women are a God fashioned second class of human.  Eve was created to reverence the image of God, and to be a helper and mate for him, to stay under his dominion, being subject to him in everything.  When you forfeit that truth, you’ve lost God’s foundational truth setting up the intended basis for all families in Genesis 1.   Satan doesn’t want the image of God to be reverenced or served.  So his aim is to deceive us about the image of God.  How better, than to pretend the image of God is common to both sexes?  Thus men will no longer be given any such reverence from the lesser sex who are now mistakenly claiming to be our equal.

The ancients also once clearly held this as a foundational belief:

Aristotle’s biology gave ‘scientific expression’ to the basic patriarchal assumption that the male is the normative and representative expression of the human species and the female is not only secondary and auxiliary to the male but lacks full human status in physical strength, moral self-control, and mental capacity. The lesser ‘nature’ thus confirms the female’s subjugation to the male as her ‘natural’ place in the universe.

However, Satan is not content to just equalize and neutralize the two sexes that God created.  He wants to invert their order and subject men, in the image of God, to harken unto the voice of their wives and to obey them, just like he plotted in Adam and Eve’s very first sin.  It was tellingly, a Feminist role reversal, where male obeyed female over God, instead of Eve obeying Adam who had rightly commanded her, the command relayed from God, not to eat the forbidden fruit.  Eve was foolishly deceived into choosing to follow her own desires and to seek advancement, to be as gods, instead of listening to the restriction from God given through her husband.  Then she chose to tempt Adam into complying with her offer, to eat the fruit as well, instead of continuing to abide by God’s restriction.

Not only did the Apostle Paul teach us that Men are the image of God, but the early churches, taught by the Apostles, also unanimously believed that only men were the image of God.

Tertullian wrote about women:  And do you not know that you are Eve?  The sentence of God on this sex of yours lives in this age: the guilt must of necessity live too.  You are the devil’s gateway; you are the unsealer of that (forbidden) tree: you are the first deserter of the divine law: you are she who persuaded him whom the devil was not valiant enough to attack.  You destroyed so easily God’s image, man.  Because of the death you merited, even the Son of God had to die.

Augustine wrote:  “. . . woman was given to man, woman who was of small intelligence and who perhaps still lives more in accordance with the promptings of the inferior flesh than by superior reason. Is this why the apostle Paul does not attribute the image of God to her?”

“. . . the woman together with her own husband is the image of God, so that that whole substance may be one image; but when she is referred separately to her quality of help-meet, which regards the woman herself alone, then she is not the image of God; but as regards the man alone, he is the image of God as fully and completely as when the woman too is joined with him in one.”

It wasn’t until the fourth century around 380 AD that Mary began to be called Mother of God, or “Theotokos” This was said as part of the controversy over the nature of Jesus. Some said he was born human but became God later. Others said Jesus was divine from the moment of inception. Those who believed that Jesus was divine at birth used the slogan: Mary the Mother of God. Actually, the phrase was more like Mary: God-bearer. Saint Ambrose, who lived in Rome before going to Milan as its bishop, venerated Mary as an example of Christian life and is credited with starting a Marian cult of virginity in the 4th century.

In the 5th and 6th century, churches in Rome began to be dedicated to Mary, and from there the Great Whore seated on the seven mountains spoken of in Revelation 17 has continued to adopt features of preexisting pagan goddess worship and further deify Mary, growing in strength in the dark ages, eventually calling Mary the “Queen of heaven”, the same old name as Old Testament idol worshippers used when committing abominations in Jeremiah 7 & 44.  Somewhere early along our church age timeline to accepting Satan’s counterfeit goddess worship, it was decided that women must also be in the image of God, because, how could Mary be a goddess, if she isn’t even able to be in the image of God?  So women were deceitfully added into the image of God to bolster the worldly reintroduction of preexisting Roman goddess worship back into the church under the guise of “honoring” Mary.  Satan’s minions deceitfully said, “You’re dishonoring the ‘Mother of God’ if you say she was a sinner and wasn’t even in God’s image”.  Jesus was also the “Son of David” who freely admitted in Psalm 51:5 Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.  Jesus’ earthly parents did not need to be sinless, for him to live the only sinless life.  Jesus is the only one worthy to open the book mentioned in Revelation.  Mary is not His equal, not a goddess, not a co-redemptrix, not a Queen of Heaven.  Mary is not to be prayed to or worshipped, in competition with Christ the King of kings.  That is idolatry, recycled and repackaged pagan goddess worship from the deceiver.

Initially Protestantism threw off the worship of Mary, and greatly reformed the church, even Catholicism was reformed to some degree.  However, women were often still proclaimed to be in the image of God, and Chivalry and false romanticized notions of love still abound.  Christian “bridal mysticism” is taught rampantly.  Women are collectively reverenced in the churches while men are berated as a sex.  The dominion of the sexes has been turned on its head.  Wives even publicly threaten their husbands with “sleeping on the couch”(sexually immoral defrauding) if they don’t comply, in front of other presumed believers.   Wives no longer consider their husbands their “Lord” or to have been created superior in order for headship, and created for imaging God to the wife.  Even the “most conservative” churches are only conserving a weakened counterfeit of God’s design. Here is an example:

In 1998, the Southern Baptist Convention overwhelmingly approved the addition of an article on the family (Article 18) to the Baptist Faith and Message which states in part:

A wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband even as the church willingly submits to the headship of Christ. She, being in the image of God as is her husband and thus equal to him, has the God-given responsibility to respect her husband and to serve as his helper in managing the household and nurturing the next generation.

What a crock of crap!  If she is in the image of God as is her husband and is thus equal to him, then she doesn’t owe her husband anything more than “equality”.   Which is part of why marriage is becoming toxic for men, there is nothing in it for them, but insult to their manhood, great risk, and no reward, other than to be constantly manipulated by a sex trading whore who thinks she is equal or better than you, and deserves your reverence while satanically never giving you any of the reverence men are truly due.   If the husband is to exhibit the headship of Jesus Christ and the wife is supposed to submit “willingly” like the church, which one of them was created to be imaging their God, and which one is to be imaging the church?  The Southern Baptist’s silly compromised statement lacks cohesive sense, it blasphemously gives the image of God to women, and also sneakily adds a serving of servitude to confound the husband’s leadership role, while sneakily reducing the wife’s submission from, in everything by design, to only when willingly given, undercutting all efforts to discipline wayward wives or exercise any righteous compulsion of the wife who is under your charge.

This idolatrous goddess worship leads down the broad road to hell, as it always has.  One woman gave up humility and subjection by “finding herself” to be in the image of God:

“Pushing through the voices of shame has produced an incredible sense of freedom and agency as I explored my own voice. For me, this became an embrace of the imago Dei.” (image of God)

Matthew 10:39 He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it.

Jesus Said “Finding yourself” is the way to lose your eternal life.  You find eternal life by giving your own life up, even to the point of death, to live for the cause of Christ.  Women should be taught to find their secondary helpmate role, for Christ’s sake, not to go find their own life according to the world and popular psychology.  They are being led to self destruction, like lambs to the slaughter.

The Apostle Paul challenged the Ephesians to give up their “tit pit” goddess Diana, in Acts 19, why don’t we listen to Paul and do the same?

Diana of Ephesus

We as a church need to repent of emasculating God and blaspheming Him, by claiming women are also in His image, when He clearly never said that, and He is not a hermaphrodite or sexually dimorphic or intersexual.  God is our Father, not both our Father and mother.  He created us, He didn’t give birth to us.  It is time we men took back our birthright, that we so easily gave away, the image of God.  No woman can ever be my equal, here on this earth.  I was made superior, in the image of the Highest.  My duty to God takes precedence over my wife.  It is a woman’s greatest possible honor to have and be able to serve a husband of her own, and to become one flesh with him, thereby joining into the image of God that he already is.  If the Truth was taught, the sexes would relate more properly, and our children would have a safer more stable future.  Every woman who wants a husband, wants one she can look up to.  You don’t look up to an equal!  To satisfy female hypergamy, people must once again correctly realize men alone are in the image of God.  Every woman who marries a man, will marry up!  That truth should be comforting for them to learn.