The New World Order

The Georgia Guidestones – The Globalist’s tyrannical plan

Globalists want to dissolve our nations to reassemble a united godless order like the one that God Himself first scattered at Babel by dividing their languages.

There is nothing new under the sun.  Not even the New World Order.  It is the same old wicked tyranny started by Nimrod (whose name meant “we will rebel”) who founded Nineveh and was also a hunter (murderer) of men.  His evil kingdom was soon ruled by his crafty long-lived queen, Semiramis.  Who was the world’s first female ruler, allegedly a sorceress, and the first person to castrate and make eunuchs of men.

Semiramis founded Babylon, and to justify continuing to rule over men after Nimrod was killed (which I suspect she arranged once he suspected her of cheating) she created the first polytheistic religion which worshipped a trinity of herself, her dead husband, Nimrod, and eventually her son, Nimrod, who was born later, well more than nine months after her husband died and supposedly became the god of the sun.  Yet her son was still purported to be his heir through divine conception, and to actually be the first Nimrod reincarnated through his rays from the sun impregnating Semiramis.

Semiramis was also the first to legalize parent-child sexual relations, and then she married her own son, “her reincarnated husband”, to keep on ruling as queen.  She was the first to be called the “Queen of Heaven” and the “Mother of god”.  Her Babylonian mystery religion was designed to hide God’s originally revealed truth, with Semiramis’s family acting as a counterfeit trinity.  Her religion was then spread throughout the world with the dispersion of people from Babel.

The Rev. Alexander Hislop in his book “The Two Babylons” shows how most ancient religions contain those same counterfeit characters who were basically functioning as mimics of Adam(God, the Sun), Eve(Venus, the Moon), The Last Adam(Adonis, Mars) and also Satan(Kronos, Saturn) just with different names in different languages, and how elements of that same Babylonian mystery religion also got infused into Christianity by the papacy in Rome.

God commanded mankind to: “be fruitful and multiply”.

Satan’s Globalist lackeys want to:
1) Murder 15/16ths of mankind
2) Have enforced eugenics
3) Reverse what God did at Babel, Etc.

You can claim it is a “Brand New” World Order if you want to.  But it is just recycling the same world-uniting rebellion that God broke up the last time humankind united to rebel against God.  The global kingdom wasn’t founded to liberate men from God’s laws, and to rule them by men’s own rules, as promised, but to enslave men through a woman’s craftiness.  Satan and his servants want us to be ruled over by women.  It is a bait & switch.  The old Whore of Babylon will again offer “peace & freedom” and again will deliver murder & tyranny and again have women emasculating and ruling men.  The new living language is mainly to help with the deception by making people illiterate of their past.  Don’t take the bait.  Resist!  Cherish your patriarchal heritage.

Sexual Equality?

I recently read an article: “Why has it become OK to attack men?”.  In that article the author states:

Created equal

I recount this history of the vote in my book The Toxic War on Masculinity, and some readers have mistakenly concluded that I oppose women’s suffrage. On the contrary, I support it.

From the beginning of the debate, there were Christians who argued in favor based on women’s spiritual and moral equality as beings made in God’s image. Suffragist Sarah Grimke declared, “Men and Women are CREATED EQUAL.” The proceedings of a Woman’s Rights Convention in 1850 spoke of “the work of Creation, when it was so gloriously finished in the garden of Eden, by placing there, in equal companionship, man and woman, made in the image of God.”

An article subtitled “What Textbooks Don’t Say about Women’s Suffrage” reports that there were “hundreds of ministers who made their churches available for suffragists to deliver their lectures, and who preached in favor of it.”

Jenna Gray-Hildenbrand of Middle Tennessee State University concludes, “It would be difficult to think of women achieving the right to vote in this country … without religious people coming together and seeing this as a religious value.”

The article is just another recent example of how time and time again when reading “Christian” articles regarding the conflict between the sexes, the “Christian” authors dutifully pledge their allegiance to “sexual equality” claiming that men and women were essentially created equal, not because God ever said that, but because they believe both men and women are equally images of God our Father and Jesus Christ His Son.  And that one claim really is the only “unquestionable” basis that sexual equality has ever had.  Any other basis for sexual equality based upon biology or ability leaves the sexes unequal.  It has been known from ancient times that men are generally stronger physically, rationally, emotionally, and have more robustness in enduring harsh environments.  Only a fool would try to dispute the truth of that generalization.

So how can the sex that is generally physically weaker, more irrational, more emotionally unstable, and generally has a weaker constitution, plausibly claim to be equal to men?  Well, unless you’re ready to rashly be led by your sex-cravings straight into fertility goddess worship, you’d have to have the masculine God of the Bible somehow state that He established a basis whereby the sexes become equalized despite their obvious differences.

But what does the Bible say?

Genesis 2:18(YLT) And Jehovah God saith, `Not good for the man to be alone, I do make to him an helper — as his counterpart.’

God said the woman was made to be the man’s (‘ê·zer) help, helper (kə·neḡ·dōw.) in front of, in sight of, opposite to him.  God said that the woman was created to be the man’s help.

I could go on with many verses: – weaker vessel — subject to your own husbands as it is fit — in subjection — as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in everything — in silence with all subjection — obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed., and Etc.

The Bible is very clear that — the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church.  The relationship is not an equal one, but a hierarchy with the woman under the man.(1 Corinthians 11:3)  So what does the Bible actually say about the image of God?

1 Corinthians 11:6(RSV) For if a woman will not veil herself, then she should cut off her hair; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her wear a veil. 7 For a man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but woman is the glory of man. 8 (For man was not made from woman, but woman from man. 9 Neither was man created for woman, but woman for man.)

1 Corinthians 11:7(CEV) Men were created to be like God and to bring honor to God. This means a man should not wear anything on his head. Women were created to bring honor to men.

So where do people find this supposed “sexual equality” in the Bible?  Well, they have been trained to infer it from just a few passages which don’t actually say men and women are equal.

Firstly, they wrongly interpret Genesis 1:27 as including the female as being the image of God, when God was quite meticulous to never ever say that in the Bible.  Yet that is almost their entire argument for sexual equality.  However, they will also twist a few other scriptures as backups to that one main misinterpreted verse.

The next verse they’ll most popularly use is Galatians 3:28.

Galatians 3:26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.  27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.  28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

But is that verse really saying that there is zero difference between men and women?  That same-sex marriage is OK, that women can do anything a man can do in the church?  Of course not.  The verse is speaking of faith in Jesus Christ resulting in salvation and identification with Christ through baptism.  And stating that everyone’s salvation works the same.  Another verse they may also use (1 Peter 3:7) states that we are offered the same grace unto salvation:

1 Peter 3:5 For in this way the holy women of former times, who hoped in God, also used to adorn themselves, being subject to their own husbands,  6 just as Sarah obeyed Abraham, calling him lord; and you have proved to be her children if you do what is right without being frightened by any fear.  7 You husbands in the same way, live with your wives in an understanding way, as with someone weaker, since she is a woman; and show her honor as a fellow heir of the grace of life, so that your[plural] prayers will not be hindered.

But of course, the verse only says that the woman is to be honored as an heir together of the same grace unto salvation, not that she is equal to her husband.  The beginning of 1 Peter 3 makes clear she is to rightly be subject to her husband even if he himself is disobedient to the word of God.

Bnonn & Foster tried to use a phrase from 2 Corinthians 3:18 as a “gotcha” proof-text, which I have shown was only referring to males.(the leadership of the church)

So, why do I continuously harp, like a broken record, about 1 Corinthians 11:7 and men (not women) being the image of God?  Because the image of God is the Bible’s and the Western world’s only possible absolute justification for categorical sexual ranking.  Either the image of God is hermaphroditic and is the unquestionable foundation for categorical sexual equality and undergirds Feminism, or else the image of God is solely masculine, and it instills categorical superiority onto all men over all women and it therefore vindicates God’s holy order of patriarchy as the righteous hierarchy of an infinitely wise and loving God.