Submittin’ like a Kitten

If only I’d married “Chad”.

The perfect man who lives just over the fence, where the grass is always greener.

Chad Thundercock

Chad Thundercock    6′ 3″  &  Insanely Confident

A recent comment made me wonder, if it is possible that women like to shift the blame for their lack of compliance & submission onto their husbands?

And, personally, being a woman, there’s nothing I love more than a dominant, masculine man who isn’t afraid to stand up and take charge. It’s pretty near impossible to be submissive to a limp dishrag who refuses to lead.

I think I have also heard women say the opposite: “if only my husband wasn’t so overbearing and demanding, then I would find it easy to submit to him.”

Many women seemingly say to themselves; I’d be submittin’ like a kitten, if only my husband was perfectly everything I wanted him to be, changing in harmony with my moods, and was a fit helper to fulfill my every desire.

The downside of the soul mate / fairy tale view of relationships

Apparently some women have difficulty submitting because their husbands are not assertive enough, while others have difficulty submitting because their husbands are too assertive.  And no doubt some have difficulty even though their husband is the perfect balance of assertiveness, because everything he is asserting is somehow just wrong.

Did she choose her own man?  The answer is: Yes!  Women are the gatekeepers of sex.  Unless she was forced to marry a man who raped her,(like in some Islamic countries) then she truly did have the option to say “no, I do not”, instead of saying “I do”.  She may have even arranged to be given away to this man by her own father.  So, how did her husband become so unworthy, that he can no longer be submitted to, as unto the Lord?  And how did the mythical “Chad Thundercock” become so perfect for so many different types of women, while their own husbands constantly miss the mark so badly?  Is “Chad” really that well-endowed?  Girlfriend! I’ve heard his manhood is almost as big as “the fish that got away”, and yet guaranteed to always feel just right.  He’s such a good lover!  He does stuff to you that you’ll love before you ever knew you’d like it.  Somehow Chad just knows.  But if your own husband did the same stuff, it would just be all wrong, and you’d feel used and violated, not like when Chad did it perfectly in your mind.

Maybe for the good of all marriages, we need to hunt Chad down and expose him as being a fabricated figmentary fantasy.  Or better yet, make him marry one of these hos he’s supposedly bedding, and then let her tell the world what a dirty rat disappointing husband Chad turned out to be, and how abusive he is, and how she was forced to divorce him and flee with the kids and all Chad’s stuff.(although she is still living in Chad’s former home)  And how she had to go to court to force Chad to fully pay for her life on easy street, while she is having to screw a growing list of men, on Chad’s dollar, to console herself about the breakup over Chad’s failure to be who she thought he should have been.

The problem for us is Chad is perpetually single, always available to even the ugliest and orneriest women, he refuses to ever marry, and he can be such a homewrecker, always one-upping husbands.  That Bastard!

How to bring back Patriarchy.


The simple truth.

The respect society gives to men, in general, is regulated and set by two factors:

  1. Society’s beliefs about men and what they deserve.
  2. What men have been conditioned to expect, and what they willingly endure.

The second factor, what men expect and tolerate, adjusts with and is set by the first factor, which makes the first factor ultimately the determinant factor.

How it was.

Men have historically been understood to be superior to women and children in Patriarchal societies.  This unquestioned belief in male superiority, kept those societies Patriarchal and wanting all male leadership for everyone’s benefit.

How it works.

Beliefs regarding the sexes relative superiority and inferiority leads to society becoming correspondingly Patriarchal, Egalitarian, or Matriarchal.

What went wrong.

It was the gradual introduction of the belief in equality of the sexes that led women to clamor for men’s rights, for men’s positions, and to despise men’s dominion over them.  Furthermore it was the belief in equality of the sexes that led men to give women the rights held by men, to allow women to take men’s former positions, and to share responsibilities, like voting, that belonged to men.   The false notion that men and women were created equal, even interchangeable, has made our families fall into chaos.  You can’t have a democracy of two.  In marriage, equality is a recipe for conflict.

What must change.

Any intended return to a society that respects male dominated leadership and respects men in general, must be preceded by a societal return to the belief in male superiority.   That belief is necessary to put back into effect and keep in effect the desired change in civil society.  If men are not believed to be superior, then male dominated leadership is considered corrupt, arrogant, usurping, and missing half of the best talent.  Every Patriarchal society is of necessity built on the foundational truth that men are superior, and are therefore deserving of the superior role, and superior regard.  The ancients clearly knew that men were superior.  Aristotle states, “as regards the sexes, the male is by nature superior and the female inferior, the male ruler and the female subject”.  Once upon a time the church unanimously believed that men were created first, and only men were created in the image of God.  Men were therefore known to be superior, known to be due greater respect, and expected to rule over women.   Men must reclaim their superiority, the image of God, and the divine right to rule that comes with it.

Feminism Backlash (rant)

Yesterday was my youngest son’s 11th birthday party.  I bet it was a nice party.  I currently get to see my two sons every second weekend.  Last weekend when my wife was picking my sons up from my house, I overheard my youngest son arguing and pleading with his mom about her allowing him to invite anybody but his father to his birthday party.   It broke my heart to hear my son having to fight to try to keep his father in his life, and knowing already how the system is unbeatably rigged against us males.

Now you might imagine that I have done some horrendous things, for a father to be kept from his sons like I have been, but sadly that isn’t even the case.  I’ve never even been charged with a misdemeanor in my whole life.  Yet I was kept from my sons, except for some rare brief instances under supervision for nine months, based upon false accusations from my wife who has three diagnosed mental disorders.  Was I or my son’s compensated in any way when my wife’s accusations were fully disproven, twice over?  No, we’ll never get that time back, or the thousands of dollar it took to disprove things that never happened.  Unfortunately I am forced to go to work every week, at a job I now hate, to pay for my wife to live with my kids in a second home I have to provide and have parties I can’t attend, Etc. Etc.  You get the picture.

If Feminism had a headquarters, I’d pay my last dime for the first spot in line to destroy it.   Don’t even build Cunt-Con.  I swear, I’ll destroy it!   I want to beat those stupid sows back into the stone age with a rod of iron!  It is the least I can do for my sons, and millions of other boys growing up fatherless like them.

Worshipping the Great Whore.

Church is a tit-pit

How the greater church became a Feminist tit-pit. 

The Bible teaches us that man was created in God’s image, and that God always and only reveals Himself as being of the masculine sex.  This original teaching has been replaced by various perversions, at many points in history, as false religion continually is raised up against the true one.   There is always just a small remnant who are on the narrow way, while the masses are being deceived and become lost.  The greater church is a counterfeit, a substitute, a Great Whore, drunk with the blood of martyrs.  The vast majority of the New Testament is warnings to us against false teaching.  Because there is always far more of that, than correct teaching.   The church of this age is a Great Whore which lusts after the world and is happy to be refilled continually with the satanic seed of neo-pagan goddess worship.

From the beginning God told us that He created man(Adam) in His own image.

Genesis 1:26a  And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness:

Genesis 1:27  So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

We are quite clearly told four times in a row in the first chapter of the first book of the Bible, that Adam(the first man) was intended to be and was made in God’s image or likeness.  It is foundational!  Then in a striking contrast we are told that God created male and female “them”(not just Adam) with no mention of it being done in God’s image.  God does not make foolish errors of omission when He writes.  It is important to note that the creation of the first female was a separate and later event after God had created Adam and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life.  So the phrase “male and female created he them.” is a summary statement telling of two separate events, including the creation of the first female, after Adam had already been made in the image of God.  The passage is like a legal product description.   We should only expect to find that which is clearly stated.

Man(Adam) = in the image of God created he him. 

Male and female = created he them.

The female, we are told, was just created by God, and there is no mention of her being in God’s image.  Nowhere in all 66 books of the Bible is there ever any statement that any earthly female is in God’s image.  While men’s state of being in the image of God, is retold many places throughout the Bible.  And the Apostle Paul clearly contrasts the man, made in the image and glory of God, with the woman, who was not to be uncovered, before God, like men, who naturally come before God bearing God’s own image and glory, and should not dishonor that by wearing a head covering.

1 Corinthians 11:5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven. For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered. For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man. For the man is not of the woman: but the woman of the man. Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.

So the Bible clearly tells, those of us with an ear to hear, that only men were created in the image of God, our Father.

Throughout the Bible, God always refers to Himself as masculine never as “it”.  He is Father, Son, and Spirit.  Although God is Spirit, God who never changes, clearly always identifies Himself as masculine.  Even His Spirit is clearly addressed as masculine(Him), and conceives masculine offspring.  The Bible never records God opening the womb of a childless woman and giving a daughter.  For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given:

  1. God gave to barren Sarah, Isaac.
  2. God gave to barren Rebekah, fraternal twin boys, Esau & Jacob, not a boy & girl.
  3. God gave to barren Rachel, Joseph.
  4. God gave to the barren wife of Manoah, Sampson.
  5. God gave to barren Hannah, Samuel.
  6. God gave to the barren Shunamite woman, a son.
  7. God gave to barren Elizabeth, John the Baptist.
  8. God gave the virgin Mary, Jesus.

Matthew 1:20 But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost.

God’s Spirit is male, not hermaphrodite.  One of Satan’s lies is that, “because God is Spirit, He can’t be male, but is both male and female, god and goddess.”

Satan delights to blasphemously emasculate God.  Ariana Grande and our culture like to blasphemously claim “God is a Woman”.

Boston University’s theologian Megan DeFranza affirms that all people are made in the image of God — male, female, and intersex.  Satan is still trying to bring God and men down, and women are still his primary vector for debasing men and supplanting God.

When God was actually made flesh, He(Jesus) was circumcised into the Abrahamic covenant committing men to God, at Jerusalem, on His eighth day, and this was attested to by the holy witnesses, Simeon and Anna.  Women are never circumcised to the true God, they are rightfully during this life the belonging of men, for whom they were created, and to whom they were given by God.

Genesis 3:12  And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.

Women are a God fashioned second class of human.  Eve was created to reverence the image of God, and to be a helper and mate for him, to stay under his dominion, being subject to him in everything.  When you forfeit that truth, you’ve lost God’s foundational truth setting up the intended basis for all families in Genesis 1.   Satan doesn’t want the image of God to be reverenced or served.  So his aim is to deceive us about the image of God.  How better, than to pretend the image of God is common to both sexes?  Thus men will no longer be given any such reverence from the lesser sex who are now mistakenly claiming to be our equal.

The ancients also once clearly held this as a foundational belief:

Aristotle’s biology gave ‘scientific expression’ to the basic patriarchal assumption that the male is the normative and representative expression of the human species and the female is not only secondary and auxiliary to the male but lacks full human status in physical strength, moral self-control, and mental capacity. The lesser ‘nature’ thus confirms the female’s subjugation to the male as her ‘natural’ place in the universe.

However, Satan is not content to just equalize and neutralize the two sexes that God created.  He wants to invert their order and subject men, in the image of God, to harken unto the voice of their wives and to obey them, just like he plotted in Adam and Eve’s very first sin.  It was tellingly, a Feminist role reversal, where male obeyed female over God, instead of Eve obeying Adam who had rightly commanded her, the command relayed from God, not to eat the forbidden fruit.  Eve was foolishly deceived into choosing to follow her own desires and to seek advancement, to be as gods, instead of listening to the restriction from God given through her husband.  Then she chose to tempt Adam into complying with her offer, to eat the fruit as well, instead of continuing to abide by God’s restriction.

Not only did the Apostle Paul teach us that Men are the image of God, but the early churches, taught by the Apostles, also unanimously believed that only men were the image of God.

Tertullian wrote about women:  And do you not know that you are Eve?  The sentence of God on this sex of yours lives in this age: the guilt must of necessity live too.  You are the devil’s gateway; you are the unsealer of that (forbidden) tree: you are the first deserter of the divine law: you are she who persuaded him whom the devil was not valiant enough to attack.  You destroyed so easily God’s image, man.  Because of the death you merited, even the Son of God had to die.

Augustine wrote:  “. . . woman was given to man, woman who was of small intelligence and who perhaps still lives more in accordance with the promptings of the inferior flesh than by superior reason. Is this why the apostle Paul does not attribute the image of God to her?”

“. . . the woman together with her own husband is the image of God, so that that whole substance may be one image; but when she is referred separately to her quality of help-meet, which regards the woman herself alone, then she is not the image of God; but as regards the man alone, he is the image of God as fully and completely as when the woman too is joined with him in one.”

It wasn’t until the fourth century around 380 AD that Mary began to be called Mother of God, or “Theotokos” This was said as part of the controversy over the nature of Jesus. Some said he was born human but became God later. Others said Jesus was divine from the moment of inception. Those who believed that Jesus was divine at birth used the slogan: Mary the Mother of God. Actually, the phrase was more like Mary: God-bearer. Saint Ambrose, who lived in Rome before going to Milan as its bishop, venerated Mary as an example of Christian life and is credited with starting a Marian cult of virginity in the 4th century.

In the 5th and 6th century, churches in Rome began to be dedicated to Mary, and from there the Great Whore seated on the seven mountains spoken of in Revelation 17 has continued to adopt features of preexisting pagan goddess worship and further deify Mary, growing in strength in the dark ages, eventually calling Mary the “Queen of heaven”, the same old name as Old Testament idol worshippers used when committing abominations in Jeremiah 7 & 44.  Somewhere early along our church age timeline to accepting Satan’s counterfeit goddess worship, it was decided that women must also be in the image of God, because, how could Mary be a goddess, if she isn’t even able to be in the image of God?  So women were deceitfully added into the image of God to bolster the worldly reintroduction of preexisting Roman goddess worship back into the church under the guise of “honoring” Mary.  Satan’s minions deceitfully said, “You’re dishonoring the ‘Mother of God’ if you say she was a sinner and wasn’t even in God’s image”.  Jesus was also the “Son of David” who freely admitted in Psalm 51:5 Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.  Jesus’ earthly parents did not need to be sinless, for him to live the only sinless life.  Jesus is the only one worthy to open the book mentioned in Revelation.  Mary is not His equal, not a goddess, not a co-redemptrix, not a Queen of Heaven.  Mary is not to be prayed to or worshipped, in competition with Christ the King of kings.  That is idolatry, recycled and repackaged pagan goddess worship from the deceiver.

Initially Protestantism threw off the worship of Mary, and greatly reformed the church, even Catholicism was reformed to some degree.  However, women were often still proclaimed to be in the image of God, and Chivalry and false romanticized notions of love still abound.  Christian “bridal mysticism” is taught rampantly.  Women are collectively reverenced in the churches while men are berated as a sex.  The dominion of the sexes has been turned on its head.  Wives even publicly threaten their husbands with “sleeping on the couch”(sexually immoral defrauding) if they don’t comply, in front of other presumed believers.   Wives no longer consider their husbands their “Lord” or to have been created superior in order for headship, and created for imaging God to the wife.  Even the “most conservative” churches are only conserving a weakened counterfeit of God’s design. Here is an example:

In 1998, the Southern Baptist Convention overwhelmingly approved the addition of an article on the family (Article 18) to the Baptist Faith and Message which states in part:

A wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband even as the church willingly submits to the headship of Christ. She, being in the image of God as is her husband and thus equal to him, has the God-given responsibility to respect her husband and to serve as his helper in managing the household and nurturing the next generation.

What a crock of crap!  If she is in the image of God as is her husband and is thus equal to him, then she doesn’t owe her husband anything more than “equality”.   Which is part of why marriage is becoming toxic for men, there is nothing in it for them, but insult to their manhood, great risk, and no reward, other than to be constantly manipulated by a sex trading whore who thinks she is equal or better than you, and deserves your reverence while satanically never giving you any of the reverence men are truly due.   If the husband is to exhibit the headship of Jesus Christ and the wife is supposed to submit “willingly” like the church, which one of them was created to be imaging their God, and which one is to be imaging the church?  The Southern Baptist’s silly compromised statement lacks cohesive sense, it blasphemously gives the image of God to women, and also sneakily adds a serving of servitude to confound the husband’s leadership role, while sneakily reducing the wife’s submission from, in everything by design, to only when willingly given, undercutting all efforts to discipline wayward wives or exercise any righteous compulsion of the wife who is under your charge.

This idolatrous goddess worship leads down the broad road to hell, as it always has.  One woman gave up humility and subjection by “finding herself” to be in the image of God:

“Pushing through the voices of shame has produced an incredible sense of freedom and agency as I explored my own voice. For me, this became an embrace of the imago Dei.” (image of God)

Matthew 10:39 He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it.

Jesus Said “Finding yourself” is the way to lose your eternal life.  You find eternal life by giving your own life up, even to the point of death, to live for the cause of Christ.  Women should be taught to find their secondary helpmate role, for Christ’s sake, not to go find their own life according to the world and popular psychology.  They are being led to self destruction, like lambs to the slaughter.

The Apostle Paul challenged the Ephesians to give up their “tit pit” goddess Diana, in Acts 19, why don’t we listen to Paul and do the same?

Diana of Ephesus

We as a church need to repent of emasculating God and blaspheming Him, by claiming women are also in His image, when He clearly never said that, and He is not a hermaphrodite or sexually dimorphic or intersexual.  God is our Father, not both our Father and mother.  He created us, He didn’t give birth to us.  It is time we men took back our birthright, that we so easily gave away, the image of God.  No woman can ever be my equal, here on this earth.  I was made superior, in the image of the Highest.  My duty to God takes precedence over my wife.  It is a woman’s greatest possible honor to have and be able to serve a husband of her own, and to become one flesh with him, thereby joining into the image of God that he already is.  If the Truth was taught, the sexes would relate more properly, and our children would have a safer more stable future.  Every woman who wants a husband, wants one she can look up to.  You don’t look up to an equal!  To satisfy female hypergamy, people must once again correctly realize men alone are in the image of God.  Every woman who marries a man, will marry up!  That truth should be comforting for them to learn.

Grateful wives, holding back the arrival of the Feminist utopia.

Korean Boxwood

Darcy Lockman writes in The Atlantic, that wives, who are grateful for their husbands help in raising their children, are holding back the rewriting of gender rules necessary to arrive at somewhere different than where we currently are with vestiges of the patriarchy still haunting us.

Ordinarily I wouldn’t bother to read such an article, but, to generate content for my blog, I held my nose and read her short screed on your behalf.

Ms. Lockman discovers her grievance: For the past 20 years, research by the Bureau of Labor Statistics has consistently found that women employed outside of the home shoulder 65 percent of child-care responsibilities, and their male partners 35 percent. … In 2017, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development called the uneven distribution of unpaid labor between men and women in the home one of the most important gender-equality issues of our time. … MenCare, a fatherhood campaign working toward child-care parity in 45 nations, estimates that at the current rate of change, it will be another 75 years before women achieve gender equality in the home —a more optimistic figure than the 200 years the United Nations International Labour Organization predicted in March, on the eve of International Women’s Day. … Women’s gratitude is doubtless a result of the well-known, deeply felt fact that while domestic labor isn’t equal now, it was even less equal before. 

So, according to Ms. Lockman, the Feminism foiling gratitude is because many wives perceive a relative improvement in the distribution of child care responsibilities since the 80’s and 90’s.  Apparently Feminists are not to be prematurely grateful for getting what they want, because giving up their raging aggrieved state may slow the progress of achieving complete parity between the sexes in the child care role.

Andrea’s misplaced gratitude is not only common, but also an impediment to the elusive goal of equity in the home. … Gratitude is a brand of benevolent sexism, a force that repels change. To offer thanks for whatever contributions men happen to make reinforces the implicit idea that parenting is women’s work, that 65/35 is a very fine place to stop. … Only once gratitude is relinquished for righteous anger will gender rules in this realm be rewritten. Then we can land somewhere different: not grateful, only glad.

So, according to Ms. Lockman, ladies you should not ever be grateful for your husband’s help with child care, until complete parity is achieved in 75 – 200 more years.  Basically, you should express no gratitude for your husband’s help, ever!  So, ladies, Please stay aggrieved and filled with anger, because your individual marriage is not to be a joy filled pothole on the grim road to our future sexless society.  /s



Dalrock has now mentioned this story:

However Lori Alexander gave it a better treatment, in this case:

The Sin of Obesity


Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

We live in deranged times where sensible thinking has become rare.  Evil is called good, and good is called evil.  One of the bizarre offshoots of Feminism is the “Fat Acceptance” movement.  The deluded adherents of “Fat Acceptance” vilify all people’s well meaning attempts to point out, the truth, that obesity is unhealthy, and degrades a person’s options in life, labelling it as “fat shaming”.  The Bible speaks against gluttony and it has been categorized by some, as one of the “Seven Deadly Sins”.  I won’t go into the overwhelming evidence that obesity is unhealthy and leads to the worsening of many other health problems, but, rest assured, there is more evidence about the ill health effects of obesity, than a person could read in a lifetime.  Perhaps the Feminist Fat Acceptance movement has adopted the slogan: “If you can’t be a man, be a manatee“.

Our churches also teach a false view of what love is.  They teach as though love is giving license, overlooking opportunities for correction, and avoiding any discipline of others at all cost.  We are taught that love is “being nice”, even when a person would benefit far more from being corrected.  And we are lectured that offering others correction, is mean, antagonistic, divisive, and unloving.

Perhaps this is part of how we come to find ourselves in the midst of an obesity epidemic.  And I believe that obesity is actually worse among church attendees.

1 Corinthians 6:19 Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God, and that you are not your own?

The Bible calls us to be good stewards of the bodies God has given us.  The bodies of redeemed Christians are in fact temples of God’s Holy Spirit.  We should honor God by taking care of the bodies He has given us, and by requiring good bodily upkeep from those whom we have been given charge over.  It is our duty, in love, to lead others to respect their own bodies and to keep them as fit tools for God’s service.

What is obesity, if not proof of a long term failure to avoid gluttony?  Do you become obese by inhaling too much air?  Or do we already know that it comes from eating too much calorie filled food and drink?

Is it loving to let Feminist inspired fatties deceive themselves?  Is it loving to let them babble about health excuses, while they’re eating in excess of their current metabolic rate?  Many claim they’re obese due to various health issues, but do those issues actually keep them from eating less?  Have they fasted and prayed for deliverance from their gluttony?  Obviously not enough!  They choose to indulge in gluttony, while the church approves, and accepts even the silliest of excuses for their undeniable bulk, stored up from an extended period without godly self-control over their appetite, and their lust for food.  They are, in effect, carrying around a huge burden of sin, which is weighing them down.  And the churches appear completely blinded to this sin of routine gluttony.  The apostate church leaders are blind guides!  Their churches are full of every kind of sin, because they, the shepherds, are blind and lost as well.  Open your eyes!  Those manatees are missing the mark, they are not living self-controlled, as God intends.  The churches are apostate, a “great whore”, a bloated and perverted mimic of God’s remnant, the bride of Christ, that endeavors to willingly follow His whole word.  The members of the Great Whore are full of wickedness and self indulgence.  While the fat of the followers may be a smaller issue, it is an enormous visible sign of their disregard and irreverence for their Creator and His holy guidance to avoid gluttony and all other sins.


  • Yo Momma is so fat, last time she wore high heels, she struck oil!
  • Yo Momma is so fat, the KFC cashier asked, “What size bucket?” and yo momma said, “The one on the roof.”
  • Yo Momma is so fat, kids jog laps around her for exercise.
  • Yo Momma is so fat, she has more rolls than a bakery.
  • Yo Momma is so fat, bears have to hide their food when she goes camping.
  • Yo Momma is so fat, she brought a spoon to the Super Bowl.

‘Biblical Gender Roles’ hits one out of the park!

Head is covered

Wow!  I couldn’t have written a better article on the topic, of Christian head coverings, myself, and I consider this a very crucial topic of anti-God rebellion in our churches and amongst Christians who rebel in full view of the world.  How can Christians be asking God for anything, and expecting to receive it, when our women’s prayers are, in form, a defiant affront to Him?  Our collective prayers are surely hindered, because we do not live with our wives in an understanding way, allowing them to defy God and throw off the headship of their husbands(the image and glory of God) by refusing to even have a symbol of that divinely commanded headship over them in the presence of angels and God himself, who made men in His own image.

I have been planning to write a post about this topic myself and have in fact already made a graphic for it.  To me, so many of the problems with today’s apostate church stem from satanic deceptions, lies, false doctrine, and disobedience related to Feminisms’ blasphemous effeminization of God, “even the Father”.  While at the same time they denigrate men, being made in God’s image and glory.  Yet some Christians will even advocate women wearing head coverings, while still refusing to acknowledge a man’s reason for not wearing one:

1 Corinthians 11:7  For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.

The difference in form makes no sense, if you view man and woman as equal creations.  You have to see that the man was in fact made superior, and first, in the image and glory of God, to understand the Apostle Paul’s explanation.  Otherwise Paul is just spouting off something that has no bearing on the matter, since both men and women share in the image of their hermaphrodite god/goddess alike.  We have to get back to the early churches Biblical belief that only men were created in the image of God.  That is foundational to understanding God’s model of patriarchy, and why holy Sarah called Abraham, “Lord”.  Flattery is a sin, not something the Apostle Peter would commend Sarah for.(1 Peter 3:6)  Sarah was acknowledging Abraham’s divine dominion over her.

Ephesians 5:22 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.  23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.  24 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.  25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;  26 That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word,  27 That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish.

If the husband images Christ, and the wife images the church, which one is an image of God?

Hello, world!

LOL!   I think I’ve been to their church a few times.

Welcome friends!

I’m just experimenting with my blog right now, and I’ll probably make plenty of mistakes, so for now, feel free to post a comment about anything that comes to your mind, we’ll discuss it.  Any tips or pointers or preferences on operating the blog would be appreciated also.  Feel free to argue and rant and abuse any others who show up.  I don’t have a policy page up yet, but just follow WordPress’s policy about specific threats of violence.(they don’t approve) Keep them vague.  Feel free to try out the features.  If I have any features?  I didn’t pay a cent for anything yet.  See if you can post photos, or videos.  Preferably entertaining ones if in fact you can post them.  Also feel free to post self gratuitous links to your own stuff, and mention if you’d like me to link to your blog or hate-site, or whatever you’re pushing.  Stuff may take a while to post initially until I get your first post greenlighted.  I look forward to getting some of this blog administration stuff figured out, and getting on to becoming a rock of offence, stuck in the Feminists’ craw.